Can somebody please explain to me this statement about X-linked recessive patterns
• Daughters of males with the trait are carriers of the trait, and do not show the trait
If a male with the trait crossed with a female who was either homozygous recessive or heterozygous for the trait, wouldn't it be possible for the daughter of that male to show the trait?
thanks
Sorry, I misunderstood your question the first time.
So, let's consider the two situations
Case 1: Affected male (X
aY). Homozygous recessive unaffected female (X
AX
A. Thus, female offspring can only be X
AX
a). As you can see the daughters are now carriers of the trait.
Case 2: Affected male (X
aY). Heterozygous unaffected female who is a carrier (X
AX
a. Thus, female offspring can be X
AX
a or X
aX
a).
This is exactly what the book says! However, in your question you said "If a male with the trait crossed with a female who was either homozygous recessive or heterozygous for the trait, wouldn't it be possible for the daughter of that male to show the trait?" ...which is misleading to us because daughter of the male can only show the trait if the mother was heterozygous in the case of X-linked recessive inheritance.