First off, for the purpose of VCE the entire MHC molecule is used to differentiate between 'self' and 'non-self'. Past assessment reports just mention MHC, as does the NOB text book.
With that being said, from my understanding (which by no means will be correct) is that all cells in an organism have a select variety of MHC I markers which express different peptide fragments (like you have suggested). Glycoproteins can also be self molecules because they have a protein portion. The self-receptors present on immune cells identify both MHC and the peptide fragments. BUT YOU DON'T NEED TO KNOW THIS!
Here's a video that may help you conceptualise this if you're interested: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DS8myTf4RUk
ALSO, I wouldn't have included 'nucleated' because MHC markers are only ever present on nucleated cells.
In fact, one past paper merely mentioned that immune cells "have receptors which can distinguish between differs types of protein markers of cells, and thus distinguish between self and non self" or something along those lines.
It didn't require you to mention "MHC" (I think it was bracketed).
Probably the most simplified way of looking at non/self identification is that:
•immune cells have self receptors for self antigens/protein markers/MHC
•they also have non self receptors for foreign antigens
•if a cell marker/protein molecule is complementary to a self receptor, it is recognised as self
•if it is complementary to a non self receptor, it is treated as foreign and non self
Remember that RBCs and self protein molecules wouldn't have MHCs, so the immune system must have a way of identifying these.
Just a question - to what extent do leukocytes of the innate response (NK cells, macrophages, neutrophils etc.) identify non-self?
Do they merely have receptors for self and anything that doesn't have self antigens are treated as foreign?