For this question, i just want to grasp a conceptual understanding of it.
It says that the blood samples were taken from the victim in which the blood had been deposited on the victim during the crime scene. DNA was extracted from white blood cells in each of the blood samples and electrophoresis of the samples was carried out.
You know how in each well there are multiple fragments, are these fragments meant to be of the same gene locus? For example, you see well 2 where it is the crime scene samples, those fragments correspond mostly to the suspect 2, but when the geneticists took the blood sample from the suspect 2, would they have taken the DNA sample from the same gene loci that they took from the crime scene sample to see whether or not the suspect would produce similar sized fragments of the same gene? Because the restriction enzyme that cuts the crime scene suspects samples would also cut the DNA of the actual suspect with the same number of fragments if it were the same loci? Also if this is the case too, do the other suspects have different sized lengths because they all have different alleles for the gene loci?
This whole theory could be incorrect because it is just my understanding of it, if it is incorrect, mind enlightening me with not the process of electrophoresis, but what samples are used from suspects? Because a question earlier on in the year asked what geneticists would do further to ensure that the suspect was indeed present during the crime scene, and the answer said that they should test another gene loci and see if the sample at the crime scene would match with the suspect's gene loci fragments. Any ideas?
Many thanks in advance.