It really depends on the context of the question. For example, a question i came across while i was completeing practice exams required you to explain whether x or y finished earlier. With x having a higher time (that is, x's time being greater than y's time) which results in a higher Z score, this does not necessarily mean that x performed better than y. In this scenario a lower Z score represents a better time.
Sorry, but that's not what i'm asking.
I'm just wondering what's a sufficient way in answering a z-score question.
In the scenario you provided, to answer the question, would you answer it: "Result y is better because of the lower z-score"?
Stick - Did you mean more specific as in add the values of the z-scores in the answer?
i.e "Result 'y' which had a z-score of 1.4 is a far better score than result 'x' which had a z-score of 1.7" etc,etc?