Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 07:55:05 pm

Author Topic: complex  (Read 947 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Bestie

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 130
  • Respect: 0
  • School: Random
complex
« on: April 26, 2014, 05:24:29 pm »
0
if z conjugate is 1/(2+3i), wouldn't z just be 1/(2-3i) cause its a reflection in the x axis?

kinslayer

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 761
  • Respect: +30
Re: complex
« Reply #1 on: April 26, 2014, 05:54:13 pm »
0
if z conjugate is 1/(2+3i), wouldn't z just be 1/(2-3i) cause its a reflection in the x axis?

The conjugate is 1/(2-3i), yes, but in order to put the number 1/(2+3i) on an Argand diagram (to take the reflection on the x-axis) you would need to express z as z = Re(z) + i*Im(z) first.

If you write z = a + bi then take the conjugate you can see why the conjugate works the way you wrote above.
« Last Edit: April 26, 2014, 05:58:16 pm by kinslayer »

Bestie

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 130
  • Respect: 0
  • School: Random
Re: complex
« Reply #2 on: April 26, 2014, 06:26:27 pm »
0
Oh ok.
Thank you so much

How do I use the completing the square method to factorise
z^2 -(3-2i)z -(4+3i)

So I started it by going
(z-(3-2i)/2)^2 -((3-2i)^2/4) -4-3i
but as I went on it didn't work out.
The ans says (z-(3+sqrt21)/2 +i) and (z-(3-sqrt21)/2 +i)

Thank you for helping

kinslayer

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 761
  • Respect: +30
Re: complex
« Reply #3 on: April 26, 2014, 07:16:11 pm »
0
How do I use the completing the square method to factorise
z^2 -(3-2i)z -(4+3i)









From here you can factorise using or you could solve for z and get the factors that way. I solved for z:



« Last Edit: April 26, 2014, 07:20:31 pm by kinslayer »

Bestie

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 130
  • Respect: 0
  • School: Random
Re: complex
« Reply #4 on: April 26, 2014, 07:27:08 pm »
0
I'm sorry I'm still a little lost how did you get to the second step?








From here you can factorise using or you could solve for z and get the factors that way. I solved for z:





kinslayer

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 761
  • Respect: +30
Re: complex
« Reply #5 on: April 26, 2014, 07:51:28 pm »
0
I'm sorry I'm still a little lost how did you get to the second step?



If we let then

So:

That almost looks like what we started with but not quite -- our constant term isn't the same. There are a few ways to deal with this, but the one that I use is where we "add 0" like this:



Now we can arrange the terms into the perfect square. I started by setting the expression to 0 (to solve for z) but you don't have to.
« Last Edit: April 26, 2014, 09:26:46 pm by kinslayer »

Bestie

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 130
  • Respect: 0
  • School: Random
Re: complex
« Reply #6 on: April 29, 2014, 04:43:28 pm »
0
thanks.

With the equation: I know how to solve it to get the hyperbola
Iz-4I-Iz+4I = 2
Ix+yi-4I- Ix+yi+4I = 2
Sqrt[(x-4)^2+y^2] – sqrt[(x+4)^2+y^2] = 2   
Sqrt[(x-4)^2+y^2] = 2+ sqrt[(x+4)^2+y^2]
(x-4)^2+y^2 = 4+ 4sqrt[(x+4)^2+y^2] + (x+4)^2+y^2
(x-4)^2= 4+ 4sqrt[(x+4)^2+y^2 + (x+4)^2
X^2 – 8x +16= 4+ 4sqrt[(x+4)^2+y^2] + X^2 + 8x +16
– 8x = 4+ 4sqrt[(x+4)^2+y^2] + 8x
.......

the hyperbola is x^2 - (y^2/15) = 1, but i was wondering how do i find the restriction on the domain cause apparently not both sides of the curve are shown...