I felt like it was a strange exam. Felt like it was set out differently to previous years. Longer short answer questions worth more marks, covering less ground. Lots of scenarios.
I was finding myself short on time too, lots of extended responses.

I thought multiple choice were trickily worded, and some strange examples. Not so much the whole definition answer type of structure.
But overall not too difficult, my cohort seemed to all think they did pretty well, I'm not so sure. I think it was deceptively difficult.
I definitely screwed up the first short answer (function of Amygdala in terms of memory - I wrote about fear and emotional responses which is learning!)
hmmm
ETA: For Larri.e - I don't remember about your first question, I would have to look at the exam. But for the Alzheimers one I said because he has normal daily functioning? No idea! Such an odd question