Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 31, 2025, 04:26:23 am

Author Topic: Exam Discussion!  (Read 49694 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

the_analyser

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • School Grad Year: 2015
Re: Exam Discussion!
« Reply #30 on: November 12, 2014, 01:19:59 pm »
I got 187.5 as well, to find voltage across it was 1.3-1 or something similar

Plitzer

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 17
  • School: Western Heights College
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Exam Discussion!
« Reply #31 on: November 12, 2014, 01:22:47 pm »
I got 187.5 as well, to find voltage across it was 1.3-1 or something similar
The photodiode is acting as the battery in the circuit, isn't it? So if it was producing how ever many amps that corresponded to 1V, then the resistor would also have 1V across it?
2013 - Business Managment [36]
2014 - English [32] Methods [42] Specialist [34] Physics [43] Revolutions [24]

ATAR: 94.90

SeanC

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 11
  • School: Ballarat High School
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Exam Discussion!
« Reply #32 on: November 12, 2014, 01:27:56 pm »
My working was
Vtotal=vloss+6
vtotal=iline*rline+6
vtotal=5i+6       if power output must be the same then p=26 so i=26/v
v=130/v +6
v^2-6v-130=0 and solve with quadratic formula
2013: Further Maths (42)
2014: Methods, Specialist, Physics, Chemistry, English Language

Chalkhous

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 22
  • School: Trinity Grammar School
Re: Exam Discussion!
« Reply #33 on: November 12, 2014, 01:30:40 pm »
2b was really odd cause if you used f=kx you got 0.4m as the extension. if you use mgx=1/2kx^2 you got 0.8m
But looking at the replies it looks like 0.8m was right which is great cause i guessed that way.

patel.aayush

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 11
  • School: Melbourne high school
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Exam Discussion!
« Reply #34 on: November 12, 2014, 01:31:15 pm »
with that photodiode question part b when the switch is open is the voltage 0? cause the voltmeter is in series and cause it has infinite resistance (or so did the q say) the voltage across photodiode is 0? or did i overthink and u were just supposed to read off the graph
2013: Biology 46
2014: Chemistry 50 | Maths Methods 50 | Physics 47 | Specialist Maths 44 |  English Language 40

Might tutor Maths Methods in 2015. PM if interested

RKTR

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 613
Re: Exam Discussion!
« Reply #35 on: November 12, 2014, 01:33:49 pm »
I got 187.5 as well, to find voltage across it was 1.3-1 or something similar
got 187.5 as well
2015-2017: Bachelor of Biomedicine (Neuroscience)
2018: Doctor of Medicine (Withdrawn)
2019: Bachelor of Commerce (Actuarial Studies?)

Ya Habibi

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 53
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Exam Discussion!
« Reply #36 on: November 12, 2014, 01:36:11 pm »
2b was really odd cause if you used f=kx you got 0.4m as the extension. if you use mgx=1/2kx^2 you got 0.8m
But looking at the replies it looks like 0.8m was right which is great cause i guessed that way.

Was it a three mark question? I got an answer of 0.8 but wasn't sure if the process was worth the three marks.
2013 Subjects: IT: Software Development (38)

2014 Subjects: Math Methods (36), English (44), French (35), Physics (36), Chemistry (38)

ATAR: 96.85

KayKay

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 23
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Exam Discussion!
« Reply #37 on: November 12, 2014, 01:36:43 pm »
got 187.5 as well
I put 187.5ohm as well but I think it might not be right. If you take the photodiode to be the power source, if it produces 1V, then the resister would also have 1V. The current is 1.6x10^-3A, which means the resister is 625ohm :/ I have no idea if this is right or not, I don't even understand how the current was changing when the light intensity on the photodiode was kept constant. It was a really odd question.
2013 - Biology [40]
2014 - English Language [37] Methods [47] Physics [44] Chemistry [43] Economics [45]
ATAR: 98.60

SeanC

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 11
  • School: Ballarat High School
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Exam Discussion!
« Reply #38 on: November 12, 2014, 01:39:55 pm »
I put 187.5ohm as well but I think it might not be right. If you take the photodiode to be the power source, if it produces 1V, then the resister would also have 1V. The current is 1.6x10^-3A, which means the resister is 625ohm :/ I have no idea if this is right or not, I don't even understand how the current was changing when the light intensity on the photodiode was kept constant. It was a really odd question.
I think i put 625ohm
2013: Further Maths (42)
2014: Methods, Specialist, Physics, Chemistry, English Language

Rishi97

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1042
  • School: The University of Melbourne
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Exam Discussion!
« Reply #39 on: November 12, 2014, 01:40:32 pm »
2014: VCE completed
2015-2017: BSc at Melb Uni

DREAM, BELIEVE, ACHIEVE!!!

evogamerz

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 6
  • School: parade college
Re: Exam Discussion!
« Reply #40 on: November 12, 2014, 01:43:54 pm »
mc answers for materials and structures

a,b,c,d,a,c,b,b,c,d,a

d4m0

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 18
  • School: BHSSC
Re: Exam Discussion!
« Reply #41 on: November 12, 2014, 01:56:03 pm »
I think i put 625ohm
I got 625 ohms as well.

theshunpo

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 113
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Exam Discussion!
« Reply #42 on: November 12, 2014, 01:56:56 pm »
What did you guys get for the '' eV question?
« Last Edit: November 12, 2014, 01:59:47 pm by theshunpo »
2013: Revolutions
2014: English | Economics | Physics | Mathematical Methods | Specialist Mathematics
ATAR: 97.20
2015-2017: Bachelor of Commerce @ UoM

S61778

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 72
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Exam Discussion!
« Reply #43 on: November 12, 2014, 02:01:53 pm »
Could you determine the mass of the planet?

bpearson

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: Exam Discussion!
« Reply #44 on: November 12, 2014, 02:02:38 pm »
I couldn't  :P