For language analysis is it actually required to state the persuasive techniques? (eg. Through the use of powerful imagery, the author....) As i'm reading a LA that got 19/20 and i cannot see any sentences that contain a statement of the persuasive technique used.
Metalanguage is good to use when you can identify it. But it is by no means
necessary to writing a good analysis. Assessors are more concerned with your ability to work closely with your selected evidence- pulling out all intimations/implications/suggestions. This should be your main priority.
In a different vein, is anyone feeling
slightly concerned about a hero prompt coming out for
Medea. I have an inkling that it may arise
However, in all honesty, I have not spent enough time familiarising myself (either in class or in my own study) with the context of a Greek hero. I find the whole issue way too subjective, and difficult to build into my existing essays. What's everyone's opinion on this?