Context: Encountering Conflict
Text: On the Waterfront
Prompt: Conflict from history can teach us many things about ourselves.
Idea 1:
Subjective perceptions and self-interest > often results in heightened emotions and loss of rationality > clash between individuals or groups when attempting to protect and enforce their personal beliefs.
- 'On the Waterfront' exemplifies this notion through the discrepancy between XYZ... characters
- Discuss incompatible values between the authorities and citizens due to selfishness and different perception of power/ rights
- How this enhances conflict through particular film techniques and then linking it to the main idea of selfishness
- Comparing these textual examples with a social parallel to demonstrate how the idea is universal
Idea 2:
Why learning from past conflict(s) is important, etc (repeating similar process as above)
Yes, that's a pretty flawless exploration, just going by that skeleton you've got there.
And mentioning the text initially (or close to the start of a paragraph, after the starting conceptualisation is out of the way) is a neat little trick for convincing the assessor you're using the text as a 'springboard'/'vehicle' into other ideas, which is exactly what they've been stressing in recent years.
I'd argue mentioning the film techniques might be a little too in-depth, but that's a matter of personal preference. I know people who preferred to analyse the text much closer than I did before moving into other areas, whereas I hated my text, so I just got that out of the way asap and linked into other territory.
I'm really struggling to think how any teacher could think
no reference to the text was a good idea, let alone a compulsory "recommendation." Almost any report or interview with VCAA assessors is not-so-subtly reminding people to use the text properly, ie. not as closely a Text Response, but nonetheless conducting an adequate exploration of (one of?) its 'core' message(s). Perhaps see if your student can sit down with their teacher and formulate an approach for the SACs together, which the two of you can then refine in lessons. Just based on experiences with students last year, it's a worthwhile, if a tad laborious process to work out what exactly their teacher is looking for, but not only will it give them (and you) more direction when working on essays, but it can earn students brownie points for taking the initiative to go beyond

And yeah, props for seeking clarification here on behalf of your student. I know stuff like this, as well as much more (probably worse) misinformation is being peddled at various schools around the state, so hopefully this can clear up misapprehensions for others as well
