Transitioning into new states of maturity can influence how an individual interacts with others. This process of gaining maturity and interacting with others is done by undertaking a journey which enables an individual to open up to new phases of life by being more acceptant.
I enjoy this! These two sentences make a lot of sense 
This concept is effectively depicted in the 2005 novel The Story of Tom Brennan, written by J.C. Burke
along as well as with the film Charlie St Cloud
Put the date in brackets)2010, directed by Burr Steers. Both composers implement vital textual devices to explore various philosophies of skirmish and relationships with one another, allowing
to the responder to challenge their beliefs an
d attitudes towards the human intricacies.
This is portrayed Most evidently, this is observed through the protagonist’ difficulty in moving away from deaths of loved ones and engaging in human interactions in order to transit into new phases of life.
This last sentence could drop off and appear later in a body paragraph. To me, it's just kind of sticking on the end. You won't lose marks for it, but consider how to use it as a way to gain marks. Can you add something on to the end there that brings it back to the concept you started with? Just try to make the introduction that little bit more "wholesome."For one to transition through life at different phases
, they must encounter difficult obstacles. This process
of transition of of transitioning into maturity challenges one’s beliefs and attitude
s. The novel, The Story of Tom Brennan, written by J.C Burk,
No need to identify the author next to the text name again, it's already in the introduction 
is a bildungsroman’s
No need for an apostrophe here 
text which demonstrates growth as change is inevitable
, . (full stop)Burk narrates the journey of the teenage protagonist Tom, who faces major changes in his life after his brother’s car accident which killed two close friends and paralysed a cousin named Fin.
I'd be trying to use this last sentence as an opportunity for analysis. You've identified the narrator, now try to expand on that. What is the significance of Burke as a narrator? Does he provide valuable insight? Does he use the first person narration? What does that first person narration do? Burke implements teenage vernacular and colloquial language to effectively communicate to the audience the consequences of drink driving
Who is the predicted audience? You've made a great point about the language, but the audience that it is aimed for isn't necessarily identified, and in this situation it would be beneficial. Because, colloquial language wouldn't relate to my dad as much as it does me. Tom creates suspense in the beginning, “My name is Tom Brennan, and this is my story”, to showcase how drink driving affects one’s transition to maturity
Try to identify exactly how suspense is built in the beginning there. I can see that suspense is built, but how? Perhaps the formal introduction provided by the first person narration engages the reader. I'd take that route. . Burke also uses first person to give the audience access to Tom’s private thoughts following the accident and to showcase Tom’s transition from an optimistic to a depressed character. This is demonstrated by the symbolic motion of the Brennan family, “closing the front of the door for the last time” to their Mumbili home and starting a new life in Coghill.
I like this! In the prologue, Burke uses the specific time of “January 23 4:30am” followed by a metaphor of “near dawn” to demonstrate the concept of ransom of the status quo and to give the audience a sense of a melancholy attitude thus displaying Tom’s negative past. This is followed by the repetition of the word “step” in “step by step to the car” symbolising the decline of the Brennan family in Mumbili. Challenging phases of life enable individual new insights of the world.
The ending to this paragraph is really good. You've got a few consecutive sentences at the end that are bam bam bam, really punchy. But then if we drag back to the beginning of the paragraph, there's a lot of discussion about the voice/narration and not a lot of linking between how the author does it, why they do it, and then linking to the purpose. With each technique needs to be an explanation of its significance. With each observation about the text, needs to be evidence and a link. The ending is really good because it analyses more than the voice. So I suggest making the voice analysis more punchy, or by combining a few of those sentences together for a really strong statement.Transitions are inevitable over time,
often leading one into an uncharted world which challenges one’s beliefs and attitudes. In The Story of Tom Brennan, Burke constantly uses flashbacks
which to give the audience a hint of the past events that Tom has encountered, as well as his dramatic change in emotions.
Tom’s transition away from the past and into the future is noticed when the Brennan’s have to transition into a new life in Coghill since they are ‘no longer wanted’ due to Daniel’s actions by the disgraced Mumbilli community which signifies Tom’s constant use of the motif of “running” throughout the novel, symbolising Tom’s evolutionary transformation, as seen where his uncle Brendan, is a catalyst for change as he trains with Tom as they climb the symbolic hill representing tom’s transition into new phases of life. Long sentence! If you cut it in half with a full stop everything will read more punchy. The metaphor of ‘mountains’ highlights a noticeable nature of transformation to confront experience that may be challenging
After reading twice, I see what you're saying. I think you should rephrase the analysis part of this just so that it becomes more clear that the mountains are symbolic of hurdles in life.. However it contrasts with the Brennans family as they are “running” away from their problems which they have left behind in Mumbili. Moreover, the use of an idiom, “Daniel Brennan was an accident waiting to happen”, demonstrates that transitioning is a difficult process as it clashes with an individual’s attitudes and beliefs. Tom’s growth in maturity and acceptance symbolises the change in attitude that
have has been influenced by human interactions, which is a catalyst for change
; which I'm inclined to start a new paragraph here! This can also be seen through the protagonist in the film ‘Charlie St Cloud’, directed by Burr Steers,
revolves around a which details the life of a young adult, Charlie, who suffers from ghostly illusions of his younger brother Sam, and depression after his close brother passed away in a car crush. The initial use of high pitched non-diegetic sounds symbolises that the protagonist, Charlie, is still grieving from the death of his little brother. The camera shot
What kind of shot? A close up? Take the analysis to the next level by identifying the type of shot! 
of Charlies face, approaches him emotionally as he had never lost a loved one, creates suspense by the use of eye level on Charlie’s face allowing the audience to depict that Charlie is still grieving from the loss of his brother. This is also depicted when Charlie is talking with his father in a close-up angle shot within a dark boarder symbolising Charlie’s challenging transition into the future juxtaposed with fear. The constant use of flashback throughout the film proves to the audience proves to the audience that loss of a loved one can negatively impact one’s life. Negative influences on one’s life may lead to new insights of the world.
Human relationships can be a crucial catalyst in encouraging changes an individual’s process of gaining maturity.
I really love your thesis statements! This is depicted in The Story of Tom Brennan, as Tom’s catalyst for change was his sexual relationship with his new girlfriend Chrissie, who helps him to forget the past and move on. This is noticed in the last page when Tom was swimming in the river with Chrissie and says, “That was the day Tom Brennan came back forever”,
I'd be commenting on the past tense here and how that works to signify a time past. symbolising Tom’s transition from his troubled past to a brighter future that is similar to Tom’s life before the accident. Throughout the novel, there is constant use of the motif of water symbolising Tom’s transition. This is depicted in the scene where Chrissie catches Tom in the shower after he realises that he is sexually interested in her, and when Tom jumps in the pool with his new friends after transitioning into Coghill and when Tom was swimming
gin the waterhole with her and says, “This is the day Tom Brennan came back forever”.
I'm not making the connection between the likeness. Either start the sentence with a different connector, or identify the likeness early on in the proceeding sentence just to make the link really clear, and consequently impressing the marker.Likewise, in Charlie St Cloud, Steer implements a high-angle shot of Charlie in the scene where he is talking to the paramedic and says, “That’s death and life you see. Notice all the little things because someone is reaching out to you”. The use of the high-angle shot symbolises that Charlie has learnt to leave his brother, after realising that no matter what he does, he won’t return, and must continue on with his life
How does the high angle shot symbolise that? Is it because it shows a force at work higher than Charlie? Or is it because it shows that from a birds eye view, this is just one little aspect of life?. At the end of the film, Steers uses a full-body shot of Charlie and his friends symbolising the effectiveness of being able to develop deeper insights of themselves and others. Human interactions with others allow an individual to transition into new phases of life.
The ability to move on can be difficult for an individual, particularly when one’s beliefs and attitudes are challenged. However, overcoming adversities and reforming personal attitudes creates strengths for individuals. Steers effectively depicts the protagonist, Charlie,
to have the encouragement to move on from the loss of his beloved brother as he uses mid-shot of Charlie and his brother sitting under the trees, Charlie says, “We’ll always be brothers”, Charlie replies, “Promise, through rain or shine”. This symbolises the strong relationship the brothers had and the effect of Sam’s death. Steers uses a close-up shot of Charlie’s girlfriend and she says, “Charlie, you didn’t die in that car crush”. Steers uses a low-angle shot of Charlie as he says, “Actually I did”. This symbolises Charlie’s allusion of death and after accident as he wishes he passed away instead of his brother, thus clashing with his attitude and beliefs.
In both, TSTB by J.C. Burke and the Film CSC by Burr Steers, the process of transition challenges attitudes and beliefs and as such enables characters to successfully transition from the past to the present and on into the future.
If you haven't used acronyms for the titles throughout, don't use them in the conclusion. Typically a conclusion should be about 3 sentences or so. I'd break up the sentence you have now. You've done amaaaaazing work with your concept statements, so reiterating them down here at the conclusion could be very powerful.End Notes:
So, like I said, I don't know this module really well but I definitely wouldn't fail you for this essay! Each and every one of your concept statements are so original, articulately expressed and overall, very clear and relevant. You should be really proud of them. For this reason, I think they should feature more. So I'd be inclined to give them some more space in your introduction, definitely give them some more room in your conclusion, but also link consistently throughout your body paragraphs to the relevant statement. The best approach might be to round off each paragraph in a really strong way, and then you can colour in the body paragraphs from there on in.
Aside from the first body paragraph which had a heavy focus on voice, all of this is very impressive in terms of sourcing different techniques each time. The way to enhance your analysis is to focus on a structure which identifies the quote, the technique, the impact on the plot as well as the intention of the composer in doing it (aka: the relation to transitions). So there are times where you do this flawlessly, and other times where the stretch between technique and outcome are a bit far. Sometimes it is a matter of spelling it out in super simple terms, and then coming back to it. My example of this is seen in the last part where you talked about the high angle shot in Charlie's text. The link between the angle shot and Charlie moving on isn't really clear - you have to spell these things out just a little bit more.
There are a few times where grammatically things just interrupted the flow, usually just a few words missing here or there. Before going into the HSC, take this essay and read it out loud very slowly in front of a mirror and you should realise the little mistakes here and there. By fixing them up, you ultimately add to the overall sophistication of the essay.
So to summarise: Give greater prevalence to your outstanding concept ideas, link technique and effect more closely, and just groom the essay a little bit so that it flows perfectly.
You should be proud of this, you've got the foundations of a really outstanding essay. It's now just about tidying things up a bit!
Let me know if you have any other questions!
