Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

July 31, 2025, 07:00:37 am

Author Topic: Section C Discussion  (Read 19114 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

literally lauren

  • Administrator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1699
  • Resident English/Lit Nerd
Section C Discussion
« on: October 28, 2015, 11:47:45 am »
Discussion for the Language Analysis here!

What did you all think? How'd you handle the comparative aspects? A copy of both speeches can be found here!
« Last Edit: October 28, 2015, 12:02:35 pm by Ned Nerb »

Mc47

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 146
  • School Grad Year: 2015
Re: Section C Discussion
« Reply #1 on: October 28, 2015, 01:10:50 pm »
So apparently 'Mathew' only had one 't' in it....


literally lauren

  • Administrator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1699
  • Resident English/Lit Nerd
Re: Section C Discussion
« Reply #2 on: October 28, 2015, 01:12:07 pm »
So apparently 'Mathew' only had one 't' in it....

LOL!
You wouldn't have been penalised :P It's convention to use the surname anyway, but it's not a big deal.

laurarm

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • School Grad Year: 2015
Re: Section C Discussion
« Reply #3 on: October 28, 2015, 01:19:45 pm »
It was so much better than last year's Section C!

Only con was that there was way too much to talk about!

schooliskool

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 92
Re: Section C Discussion
« Reply #4 on: October 28, 2015, 01:21:33 pm »
Yeah I was happy it couldn't be considered a hard VCAA one, definitely do-able! Managed to get a fair bit out. The picture was a bit vague though, what did you guys write about it?

Splash-Tackle-Flail

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 797
  • diagnosed with bangali-fever
Re: Section C Discussion
« Reply #5 on: October 28, 2015, 01:29:04 pm »
Ouch. I'm done. This one was horrid.
VCE: Done!
2016:  Monash University, Bachelor of Medicine/Bachelor of Surgery (Honours)
Currently offering Methods and Chemistry tutoring for 2016! (Currently full for 2016)
Splash's Life Tips :)
How to be the one who knocks

laurarm

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • School Grad Year: 2015
Re: Section C Discussion
« Reply #6 on: October 28, 2015, 01:30:39 pm »
Yeah I was happy it couldn't be considered a hard VCAA one, definitely do-able! Managed to get a fair bit out. The picture was a bit vague though, what did you guys write about it?

I wasn't too sure about it too!
I wrote that behind Nguyen's team's success it was a team effort and I compared it with the banner in my comparison paragraph. I also wrote that it showed that volunteer work is a team effort which everyone can be a part of.

cosine

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3042
Re: Section C Discussion
« Reply #7 on: October 28, 2015, 01:31:44 pm »
damn i only wrote about one visual, will this hurt my score? I just wrote about one because i thought they would convey the same 'symbolism'?

:'(
2016-2019: Bachelor of Biomedicine
2015: VCE (ATAR: 94.85)

schooliskool

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 92
Re: Section C Discussion
« Reply #8 on: October 28, 2015, 01:34:28 pm »
I wasn't too sure about it too!
I wrote that behind Nguyen's team's success it was a team effort and I compared it with the banner in my comparison paragraph. I also wrote that it showed that volunteer work is a team effort which everyone can be a part of.
Yeah I did basically the same. Coming together in unison, no bias towards gender/race etc. I was a little mad that I couldn't get as much analysis as we usually do (or how much we are meant to), hopefully it wasn't just me though haha.
Then for the award banner I wrote some bull about how the hand is coming from above, like 'helping someone in need' gg
« Last Edit: October 28, 2015, 01:38:03 pm by schooliskool »

Mc47

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 146
  • School Grad Year: 2015
Re: Section C Discussion
« Reply #9 on: October 28, 2015, 01:35:43 pm »
LOL!
You wouldn't have been penalised :P It's convention to use the surname anyway, but it's not a big deal.

Haha that's alright then. I only used his first name in the intro

GeniDoi

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 209
  • How can mirrors be real if our i's aren't real?
  • School: John Monash Science School
  • School Grad Year: 2015
Re: Section C Discussion
« Reply #10 on: October 28, 2015, 01:36:39 pm »
I liked it, certainly more personality and expression than last years. To me it seemed the response wasn't that much of a opposition towards the original piece (as it was last year) but rather a gentle clarification which I incorporated into my contention. I didn't explicitly state that he "disagrees" with her. Though I could be wrong and 6/10 incoming.
[2014] Methods: 40
[2015 Aims] English [40+] - Specialist [40+] - Physics [43+] - Algorithmics [37?] - Psychology [32]
[2016-2019] BCommerce/BCompSci @ Monash Uni

djsbrks

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 30
  • School: ABC
Re: Section C Discussion
« Reply #11 on: October 28, 2015, 01:44:23 pm »
Spent waaay too long on language analysis, compromised my writing time and quality for section A and B, will be lucky to get a 35

acm9

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 17
  • School Grad Year: 2015
Re: Section C Discussion
« Reply #12 on: October 28, 2015, 01:46:49 pm »
i still am stumped on her contention
English (44)
Bus man (38)
Indo (37)
Eng Lang (34)
Atar: 92.3

laurarm

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • School Grad Year: 2015
Re: Section C Discussion
« Reply #13 on: October 28, 2015, 01:48:56 pm »
Yeah I did basically the same. Coming together in unison, no bias towards gender/race etc. I was a little mad that I couldn't get as much analysis as we usually do (or how much we are meant to), hopefully it wasn't just me though haha.
Then for the award banner I wrote some bull about how the hand is coming from above, like 'helping someone in need' gg

Yeah for the banner I basically wrote the same thing, that it showed a 'helping hand'.

thaaanyan

  • Guest
Re: Section C Discussion
« Reply #14 on: October 28, 2015, 01:56:13 pm »
 
I liked it, certainly more personality and expression than last years. To me it seemed the response wasn't that much of a opposition towards the original piece (as it was last year) but rather a gentle clarification which I incorporated into my contention. I didn't explicitly state that he "disagrees" with her. Though I could be wrong and 6/10 incoming.
I had roughly the same idea, so we can both get 6s together if that's the case! But yeah i didn't explicitly highlight it either, i just talked about how she wanted to emphasise bigsplash as a company whose cared about creating a culture of collaboration in the community, how like - everyone else forgets volunteers except bigsplash; and then in contrast Nguyen's highlights that personal satisfaction is the true reward for volunteering
wasn't a bad analysis, though i could have been a bit more insightful in places. overall i don't really know how to feel about my performance.  I felt as though this was a slightly harder analysis then last year, if only because as an award giving speech her contention wouldn't have been as immediately clear.