Although it may seem that the topic you choose counts for a large portion of your mark it is essentially how well you argue your point, the persuasive techniques you use and your confidence when convincing your audience and teacher to align with your point of view. Having said this, however, in order for that to be possible and engage your audience of your logically established arguments, it would serve you well to find a topic that isn't hackneyed to avoid sounding trite.
There are a plethora of topics have been contentiously debated in the past year and are still relevant, some of which include:
- the issue surrounding child vaccination and whether families that resist vaccinations should be denied government benefits for their children
Overview: Last year (2015) the federal government announced that parents who refuse to vaccinate their children will not receive government benefits worth up to $15,000 per child.
Under current laws, families with children who are not immunised can still receive annual childcare benefits if they have a personal, philosophical or religious objection. Under the proposed new guidelines 'conscientious objection' to vaccination would no longer be allowed for parents who refuse to vaccinate their children but still want to receive child care payments and family tax benefit supplements
- Should the voting age in Australia be lowered to 16 years
Overview:federal Labor leader, Bill Shorten, pledged his party's support for a lowering of the voting age to 16 in Australia, should his party be returned to government. Mr Shorten made this promise as part of an address to the New South Wales Young Labor conference.Response from political scientists and from media commentators has been mixed; with some seeing it as an overdue reform and others believing it to be ill-judged.
Hope all goes well!