I'm gonna have a stab at these they may not be 100% correct.
1. A proprietor bought a few items he estimated would have a useful life in business for three years (computer, printer, stapler, ruler), yet a friend told him items are expensive and represent economic sacrifice. They're assets, aren't they? But there are some reasons why they could be expenses, right?
How is Relevance applied to this situation?
The computer and the printer are considered non-current assets as they are resources controlled by the entity (as a result of past events), from which future economic benefits are expected after a period of 12 months, proven as they are estimated to have a useful life of three years. The stapler and ruler are not assets however, as while they are a resource controlled by the entity from which future economic benefits are expected, they are not of enough financial value to make an impact on the accounting reports, hence they are not relevant in decision-making. As a result, they are categorised as stationery expense as they are a consumption of economic benefits that decreases assets (Bank), which leads to a decrease in OE (Stationary expense)
2. Reference to accounting principles.. how applied to these scenarios?
- Business premises purchased for $320 000. Now valued at $480 000 , $490 000, and $510 000 by 3 valuers
Historical cost principle states that the recording of a transaction should be valued at cost price, as this value is verifiable by reference to a source document. In this case the premises will be valued in accounting reports at $320 000.
- Preparing income statements based on her memory and not from business docs
Historical cost principle states that transactions should be recorded at their cost price, as this value is verifiable by reference to a source document. By recording transactions from memory, the figures are not verifiable by reference o a source document, and hence this principle is breached.
- Roger prepares a balance sheet on the basis of what he expects to receive if he sells firm's assets next year
The going concern principle states that the life of the business is assumed to be continuous, and it's records are to be kept on this basis. Therefore, Roger should maintain business records on the assumption that the life of the business is ongoing, not based off expectations that he will sell the firms assets.
- Nancy does not prepare an income statement every year and completed accounting reports for a three-year period (profit of $65000)
The reporting period principle states that the life of the business must be divided into periods of time, as this allows for reports to be prepared, these reports should reflect the reporting period in which a transaction occurs. The ATO require that the business prepare reports at lease once a year, for taxation purposes. Hence, this principle is breached as the income statement has not been prepared for three years.