Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 23, 2025, 01:49:56 am

Author Topic: 3U Maths Question Thread  (Read 1499125 times)  Share 

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2490 on: July 21, 2017, 10:52:27 pm »
+1
It's a sly trick that takes advantage of the ratio of intercepts on transversals of parallel lines. I do not advise this method unless you are absolutely certain you know what you are doing.
Of course, in this demonstration I looked at the y-coordinates instead of the x-coordinates like they did in the question. The idea is still the same, however.
« Last Edit: July 21, 2017, 10:54:02 pm by RuiAce »

junzhang

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 17
  • Respect: 0
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2491 on: July 22, 2017, 11:21:34 am »
0
Hi again,
Could you help me with this circle geometry question?
Thanks so much for all your help! :)

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2492 on: July 22, 2017, 11:39:12 am »
+1
Hi again,
Could you help me with this circle geometry question?
Thanks so much for all your help! :)

Here is a diagram. I have other things to attend to now so you should give it a go (and preferably someone else as well), but if you're still stuck and receive no further help by the time I'm back I can look at it later.

That question is clearly from a source prior to 1995 because of the font used, so construction should be anticipated. Also, it is clear that \(\angle AOB = 2\angle ACB\).

kiwiberry

  • HSC LECTURER
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 315
  • Respect: +97
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2493 on: July 22, 2017, 12:32:27 pm »
+3
Hi again,
Could you help me with this circle geometry question?
Thanks so much for all your help! :)


Let \(\angle ACB= x \)
As Rui said, \(\angle AOB = 2x\)
Construct AB. Triangle AOB is isosceles (OA=OB). Therefore \(\angle OAB= \angle OBA = 90 -x \)
Also, \(\angle OAC = \angle ACB = x \) (alternate angles, OA||BC)
Therefore \(\angle CAB = (90-x)-x=90-2x \)
So using the angle sum of triangle KAB, \( \angle AKB = 180 - (90-2x)-(90-x) =3x \)!
HSC 2017: English Adv (93) | Maths Ext 1 (99) | Maths Ext 2 (97) | Chemistry (95) | Physics (95)
ATAR: 99.85

anotherworld2b

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 747
  • Respect: 0
  • School Grad Year: 2017
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2494 on: July 22, 2017, 01:36:12 pm »
0
I am having trouble with this question. I am not sure how to do it without a calculator and antidifferentiate it

I made Inx = 1 + In 2 to find where they intersect. I found x to be equal 2e. I did this using a calculator. But I'm not sure how to do this without a calculator.

So far I know that the upper limit is 2e and the lower limit is 1 but I'm not sure what to do from here.

jakesilove

  • HSC Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *******
  • Posts: 1941
  • "Synergising your ATAR potential"
  • Respect: +196
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2495 on: July 22, 2017, 01:48:37 pm »
+2
I am having trouble with this question. I am not sure how to do it without a calculator and antidifferentiate it

I made Inx = 1 + In 2 to find where they intersect. I found x to be equal 2e. I did this using a calculator. But I'm not sure how to do this without a calculator.

So far I know that the upper limit is 2e and the lower limit is 1 but I'm not sure what to do from here.

First, let's get the intercept without a calculator






Now, we want to find the shaded area, which is



First, we should differentiate the function in the question. Presumably that will help!



By the product rule. Wow, how convenient. So, we can say that



You should be able to get to an answer from there.
ATAR: 99.80

Mathematics Extension 2: 93
Physics: 93
Chemistry: 93
Modern History: 94
English Advanced: 95
Mathematics: 96
Mathematics Extension 1: 98

Studying a combined Advanced Science/Law degree at UNSW

anotherworld2b

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 747
  • Respect: 0
  • School Grad Year: 2017
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2496 on: July 22, 2017, 02:15:24 pm »
0
I have some questions to ask if that's okay :D
1. For In (x) = In (2e)
can you drop 'In' because it is on both sides? Does this work for logs as well? ( I faintly remember it does?)
2. why do you ant differentiate In x? (isn't it the gradient of y = x In x -x )
3. I was wondering don't you have to have the integral of y = 1 + In 2 minus the integral of In x to find the shaded area?

First, let's get the intercept without a calculator






Now, we want to find the shaded area, which is



First, we should differentiate the function in the question. Presumably that will help!



By the product rule. Wow, how convenient. So, we can say that



You should be able to get to an answer from there.

Shadowxo

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 983
  • Graphing is where I draw the line.
  • Respect: +516
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2497 on: July 22, 2017, 02:29:03 pm »
+1
I have some questions to ask if that's okay :D
1. For In (x) = In (2e)
can you drop 'In' because it is on both sides? Does this work for logs as well? ( I faintly remember it does?)
2. why do you ant differentiate In x? (isn't it the gradient of y = x In x -x )
3. I was wondering don't you have to have the integral of y = 1 + In 2 minus the integral of In x to find the shaded area?


1. Yes, it's saying if you take the log of x it's the same as taking the log of 2e. Therefore, x must be 2e. Alternatively, you could solve it saying x=eln(2e)=2e
2. You want to find the integral of ln(x) (area under the graph). Since you know that which is what you want to find :) derivative is like the opposite of integration
3. The integral of ln x is the area under the graph (the shaded part). If you wanted to find the white part under the graph of y = 1 + In(2), you could use (with bounds) but that isn't required here.

Hope this helps :)

Edited to put in latex code :) Also never be afraid of asking questions!
« Last Edit: July 22, 2017, 02:35:28 pm by Shadowxo »
Completed VCE 2016
2015: Biology
2016: Methods | Physics | Chemistry | Specialist Maths | Literature
ATAR : 97.90
2017: BSci (Maths and Engineering) at MelbUni
Feel free to pm me if you have any questions!

jakesilove

  • HSC Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *******
  • Posts: 1941
  • "Synergising your ATAR potential"
  • Respect: +196
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2498 on: July 22, 2017, 02:30:22 pm »
+1
I have some questions to ask if that's okay :D
1. For In (x) = In (2e)
can you drop 'In' because it is on both sides? Does this work for logs as well? ( I faintly remember it does?)
2. why do you ant differentiate In x? (isn't it the gradient of y = x In x -x )
3. I was wondering don't you have to have the integral of y = 1 + In 2 minus the integral of In x to find the shaded area?


Yep, two logs equal each other, then the 'inside' of those logs must equal each other, if their bases are the same. In other words


then


The question is just asking us to find the area under the curve of ln(x). So, we need to integrate ln(x), because that's how you find the area under the curve. That first function was just used to show you HOW to integrate ln(x), because you can't do that easily in 3U maths.

Again, unless I've misinterpreted the question, it is just asking you to find the area under the curve y=ln(x). The other function is there to tell you where the upper limit of integration is, but not to vary to actual area. It's a weird question, sure, but it comes down to a standard integration question.
ATAR: 99.80

Mathematics Extension 2: 93
Physics: 93
Chemistry: 93
Modern History: 94
English Advanced: 95
Mathematics: 96
Mathematics Extension 1: 98

Studying a combined Advanced Science/Law degree at UNSW

anotherworld2b

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 747
  • Respect: 0
  • School Grad Year: 2017
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2499 on: July 22, 2017, 02:43:35 pm »
0
does it work the same for natural logs?
I see now :D
I believe I read the question wrong :P

I've been looking at some videos on youtube on U substitution and integration by parts. But I have some questions.
1. How do you determine what you should make to be U? (U substitution)
2. How do you determine what u and dv is? (integration by parts)

Yep, two logs equal each other, then the 'inside' of those logs must equal each other, if their bases are the same. In other words


then


The question is just asking us to find the area under the curve of ln(x). So, we need to integrate ln(x), because that's how you find the area under the curve. That first function was just used to show you HOW to integrate ln(x), because you can't do that easily in 3U maths.

Again, unless I've misinterpreted the question, it is just asking you to find the area under the curve y=ln(x). The other function is there to tell you where the upper limit of integration is, but not to vary to actual area. It's a weird question, sure, but it comes down to a standard integration question.

jakesilove

  • HSC Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *******
  • Posts: 1941
  • "Synergising your ATAR potential"
  • Respect: +196
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2500 on: July 22, 2017, 03:31:06 pm »
+1
does it work the same for natural logs?
I see now :D
I believe I read the question wrong :P

I've been looking at some videos on youtube on U substitution and integration by parts. But I have some questions.
1. How do you determine what you should make to be U? (U substitution)
2. How do you determine what u and dv is? (integration by parts)


Yes, because the rule applies equally when you set the base equal to e.

In 3U maths, you'll always be given the substitution, so don't worry about that. If you're not doing 4U maths, you don't need to know integration by parts.
ATAR: 99.80

Mathematics Extension 2: 93
Physics: 93
Chemistry: 93
Modern History: 94
English Advanced: 95
Mathematics: 96
Mathematics Extension 1: 98

Studying a combined Advanced Science/Law degree at UNSW

anotherworld2b

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 747
  • Respect: 0
  • School Grad Year: 2017
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2501 on: July 22, 2017, 03:39:10 pm »
0
Would it be possible for you to explain to me how you would identify what to substitute for both methods please? I'm a wace student so I don't learn 3U and 4U content.

Is U substitution used for when there is a fraction and integration by parts for when two terms are multiplied?
I am not sure how to antidifferentiate tan x. I made it = to sinx/cosx but I'm not sure what to do for U substitution 
Yes, because the rule applies equally when you set the base equal to e.

In 3U maths, you'll always be given the substitution, so don't worry about that. If you're not doing 4U maths, you don't need to know integration by parts.

jakesilove

  • HSC Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *******
  • Posts: 1941
  • "Synergising your ATAR potential"
  • Respect: +196
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2502 on: July 22, 2017, 03:56:07 pm »
+2
Would it be possible for you to explain to me how you would identify what to substitute for both methods please? I'm a wace student so I don't learn 3U and 4U content.

Is U substitution used for when there is a fraction and integration by parts for when two terms are multiplied?
I am not sure how to antidifferentiate tan x. I made it = to sinx/cosx but I'm not sure what to do for U substitution 

Jamon has written a stellar guide HERE that goes through all of integration by substitution! U substitution is used where it works, and integration by parts is used where that works. Unfortunately there's no hard-and-fast rule in terms of when you should use them; Integration by substitution is probably 'easier', but integration by parts works is far more cases. Deciding which terms to define in both methods comes down to practice, and again there just aren't any rules there.

Looking to your specific question



Let



Substituting this into our integral



However, you didn't need to do any of this; we know that

ATAR: 99.80

Mathematics Extension 2: 93
Physics: 93
Chemistry: 93
Modern History: 94
English Advanced: 95
Mathematics: 96
Mathematics Extension 1: 98

Studying a combined Advanced Science/Law degree at UNSW

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2503 on: July 22, 2017, 04:37:19 pm »
+1
However, you didn't need to do any of this; we know that


There's a tad problem in that he does WACE and things are different... not sure if you were aware of that.

Usually when I get to his query before someone else does and it's outside the relevant HSC course he posted I just make a remark in red about it to the others.

junzhang

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 17
  • Respect: 0
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2504 on: July 23, 2017, 05:51:46 pm »
0
Hi,
Could you help me with this binomial proof question?
Unfortunately, Cambridge does not give solutions
can't thank you guys enough! :D

Hi,
If that's ok, could you also explain this question? I have no idea where to go with the "even" and "odd" values
thanks :)

Mod edit: Merged posts :)
« Last Edit: July 23, 2017, 06:17:13 pm by kiwiberry »