Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

March 15, 2026, 10:41:51 am

Author Topic: HSC Physics Question Thread  (Read 1393988 times)  Share 

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

blasonduo

  • Moderator
  • Forum Obsessive
  • *****
  • Posts: 405
  • Schrodinger waved while Heisenberg didn't?
  • Respect: +356
Re: HSC Physics Question Thread
« Reply #3405 on: May 26, 2018, 11:31:13 pm »
+3
So for my assessment we are doing a transformer prac. I don't specifically know what we will be doing but we will be asked on possible sources of error and suggestions for improvement for the prac. Any help is appreciated, thanks.

Hey! Assuming you measure the output voltage compared to the input voltage, I'll give you the two main ones I can think of. :))

1) We know practically, transformers are not 100% efficient, and that through flux leakage and eddy currents, the output voltage will be lower than the theoretical. To improve this, using better core materials such as iron and making sure it is laminated etc...

2) The process in which we are measuring, are we using an analogue voltmeter or a digital voltmeter? In what ways would recording a value from an analogue voltmeter differ from a digital one?

Hope this helps.

Hi guys can anyone pls explain the relative simultaneity for me :(

I am so confused.
For example suppose in a very long train that is moving at relativistic speed and fireworks are launched at both ends of the train at the same time. Which observer will see that the launching simultaneous ? The one inside the train and stands in the middle or the observer from outside ?

Thanks alot guys !!

Hello!! :))

The outside observer would see the fireworks explode at the same time.

To figure this out, imagine being on the train, when the fireworks explode, we are travelling towards one firework and away from the other. As light is constant for all observers, the light from the firework in front of us will get to us slightly faster. Meaning we will see one firework before the other.

Another way to which could (?) make it easier to understand...

Imagine a 100-meter track, there are two identical runners, one at the finish line and one at the starting line; they will be running towards each other. You, however, stand exactly 50meters between them. When the race starts, you begin to run towards the finish line. From this, we know we are running towards the guy at the finish line, and hence we will get to him first.

Hope this helps :))
2018: UNSW B science (physics)/B education

Kicking myself into gear

HSC Physics Topics 1 & 2 Exam!

owidjaja

  • National Moderator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1315
  • Bibliophile. Stationery addict.
  • Respect: +1010
Re: HSC Physics Question Thread
« Reply #3406 on: June 01, 2018, 07:41:17 pm »
0
Hey guys,
I have an assignment coming up where I have to build a model- I've decided to make a magnetic induction/induction motor (as you can see in my screenshot). I know I'll be needing: string (not sure which type), a stand of some sort to hold up my string, a pie base, a strong magnet and something that can rotate really fast.

Would anyone here happen to know where I can find a strong magnet? And what could I use that can rotate really fast? My Excel textbook suggested a drill chuck but I kinda find that a bit too much, and my physics teacher suggested a motor, but I have no clue how to make a motor work...

Thanks in advance :)
2018 HSC: English Advanced | Mathematics | Physics | Modern History | History Extension | Society and Culture | Studies of Religion I

ATAR: 93.60

2019: Aerospace Engineering (Hons)  @ UNSW

blasonduo

  • Moderator
  • Forum Obsessive
  • *****
  • Posts: 405
  • Schrodinger waved while Heisenberg didn't?
  • Respect: +356
Re: HSC Physics Question Thread
« Reply #3407 on: June 01, 2018, 09:58:19 pm »
+3
Hey guys,
I have an assignment coming up where I have to build a model- I've decided to make a magnetic induction/induction motor (as you can see in my screenshot). I know I'll be needing: string (not sure which type), a stand of some sort to hold up my string, a pie base, a strong magnet and something that can rotate really fast.

Would anyone here happen to know where I can find a strong magnet? And what could I use that can rotate really fast? My Excel textbook suggested a drill chuck, but I kinda find that a bit too much, and my physics teacher suggested a motor, but I have no clue how to make a motor work...

Thanks in advance :)

Hey! I know that Jaycar sells Neodymium rare Earth magnets which are very strong and would be suitable for your experiment, but they are pretty pricey (i.e. $10-20)

When I made my generator in the HSC, I made my own handcrank, which utilised mechanical advantages, such as a big wheel for me to crank while the axle spinning the actual magnets pretty small. Cogs are the easy way to go (but I used rubberbands ;) ) Also make sure you have a solid base on which you are cranking. If it is unsteady, your "spin potential" dramatically decreases! I guess it's really up to you to find what works for you (and what's easy to construct ;) )

All in all, with the strong magnets, you might not need a fast spinning thingo, the induction was actually quite obvious even with weak magnets!

If you need any other specific question, ask away! I'll try my best!

I'd love to see your progress on this!
« Last Edit: June 01, 2018, 10:00:07 pm by blasonduo »
2018: UNSW B science (physics)/B education

Kicking myself into gear

HSC Physics Topics 1 & 2 Exam!

owidjaja

  • National Moderator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1315
  • Bibliophile. Stationery addict.
  • Respect: +1010
Re: HSC Physics Question Thread
« Reply #3408 on: June 01, 2018, 10:23:48 pm »
+1
Hey! I know that Jaycar sells Neodymium rare Earth magnets which are very strong and would be suitable for your experiment, but they are pretty pricey (i.e. $10-20)

When I made my generator in the HSC, I made my own handcrank, which utilised mechanical advantages, such as a big wheel for me to crank while the axle spinning the actual magnets pretty small. Cogs are the easy way to go (but I used rubberbands ;) ) Also make sure you have a solid base on which you are cranking. If it is unsteady, your "spin potential" dramatically decreases! I guess it's really up to you to find what works for you (and what's easy to construct ;) )

All in all, with the strong magnets, you might not need a fast spinning thingo, the induction was actually quite obvious even with weak magnets!

If you need any other specific question, ask away! I'll try my best!

I'd love to see your progress on this!
Hmm, that rubber band is a great idea! I was thinking of having the magnet glued to a bunch of craft sticks and have a rubber band somehow attached to the craft sticks so it will rotate (kinda like those rubber band cars). But I'm trying to figure out where exactly the rubber band would be located if I were to do so. Any ideas?
2018 HSC: English Advanced | Mathematics | Physics | Modern History | History Extension | Society and Culture | Studies of Religion I

ATAR: 93.60

2019: Aerospace Engineering (Hons)  @ UNSW

not a mystery mark

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 55
  • “Sugar Peas!”
  • Respect: +1
Re: HSC Physics Question Thread
« Reply #3409 on: June 03, 2018, 05:12:11 pm »
0
Howdy again.
Curious to how to approach this question.

"A toy car at rest of mass 250g is hit by a toy truck and travels horizontally for 50.0m in 2.0s. Calculate the instantaneous speed just after being hit."

I just keep getting 0m/s :')

Tyy for checking this out 🌷🌷🌷🌸🌸
Class of 2019: Advanced English [97], Extension 1 English [47], Extension 1 Maths [88], Extension 2 Maths [89], Physics [93], Business Studies [85]
ATAR: 98.55
2020-2025:  B Science (Honours)/B Arts [UNSW], Specialisation Physics/Philosophy

S200

  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1108
  • Yeah well that happened...
  • Respect: +244
Re: HSC Physics Question Thread
« Reply #3410 on: June 03, 2018, 05:48:04 pm »
+1
Howdy again.
Curious to how to approach this question.

"A toy car at rest of mass 250g is hit by a toy truck and travels horizontally for 50.0m in 2.0s. Calculate the instantaneous speed just after being hit."

I just keep getting 0m/s :')

Tyy for checking this out 🌷🌷🌷🌸🌸
Are we including resistive forces? If not, isn't it just 25 m/s?

« Last Edit: June 03, 2018, 05:57:59 pm by S200 »
Carpe Vinum

\(\LaTeX\) - \(e^{\pi i }\)
#ThanksRui! - #Rui\(^2\) - #Jamon10000

5233718311 :D

owidjaja

  • National Moderator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1315
  • Bibliophile. Stationery addict.
  • Respect: +1010
Re: HSC Physics Question Thread
« Reply #3411 on: June 06, 2018, 10:36:18 pm »
0
Hey guys,
Just a general question on superconductors: is there any benefit in using liquid helium instead of liquid nitrogen?
2018 HSC: English Advanced | Mathematics | Physics | Modern History | History Extension | Society and Culture | Studies of Religion I

ATAR: 93.60

2019: Aerospace Engineering (Hons)  @ UNSW

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: HSC Physics Question Thread
« Reply #3412 on: June 06, 2018, 10:42:19 pm »
+2
Hey guys,
Just a general question on superconductors: is there any benefit in using liquid helium instead of liquid nitrogen?
I think it's just the issue of temperature and melting points. By the time helium has finally condensed into a liquid, nitrogen has already solidified.

(So liquid helium, which is just colder by nature, should be able to cool things down even further.)

Fizzycyst

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 18
  • Respect: +1
Re: HSC Physics Question Thread
« Reply #3413 on: June 12, 2018, 07:20:10 pm »
+1
Hey guys,
Just a general question on superconductors: is there any benefit in using liquid helium instead of liquid nitrogen?

Liquid He is used to cool down the Low Tc superconductors (Type I Metals and Type II Metals and Metal Alloys) as Liquid Nitrogen is not cold enough to get below the Tc of these materials, whereas Liquid Nitrogen is used to cool the High Tc superconductors (Type II Ceramics, cuprates etc..) as their Tc are above the boiling point of Nitrogen. You could use Liquid He to cool High Tc superconductors, it would kind of defeat the purpose though.
One thing which would arise is that by making the superconductor cooler, it can withstand a higher external magnetic field -- so it could carry larger currents

justwannawish

  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 264
  • Respect: +41
Re: HSC Physics Question Thread
« Reply #3414 on: June 15, 2018, 11:32:27 pm »
0
Hey guys!
Our assessment at school is a skills task on the photoelectric effect and Thomson's experiment. What are the types of things we should expect? I've done the past HSC questions on the two experiments and they are basically largely around descibing the experiments, and calcuating work function/threshold frequency for photoelectric. Also could anyone help me out with the accuracy reliability and validity aspects of those experiments? Our teacher said this would definitely be included in the exam :/

justwannawish

  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 264
  • Respect: +41
Re: HSC Physics Question Thread
« Reply #3415 on: June 17, 2018, 07:17:35 pm »
0
Hi guys, kinda in hand with my other q, does increasing the amount of frequencies measured for photoelectric improve the reliability or accuracy of it? any other qays to improve accuracy, validity and reliability of data?

jamonwindeyer

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 10149
  • The lurker from the north.
  • Respect: +3108
Re: HSC Physics Question Thread
« Reply #3416 on: June 18, 2018, 12:17:59 am »
+1
Hi guys, kinda in hand with my other q, does increasing the amount of frequencies measured for photoelectric improve the reliability or accuracy of it? any other qays to improve accuracy, validity and reliability of data?

It depends on what you are measuring! But if you are measuring the work function of your metal, definitely improves the reliability of the experiment, since it is additional repetition. Each experiment for every frequency will yield a value for the work function, if they are all close then you can deem your experiment to be more reliable since it can get the same result (or similar) with repetition. Accuracy comes from how close the thing is to the expected result, so your repetitions might not necessarily improve how accurate it is. For example, if your experiment is yielding a work function ten times greater than the actual value, then it doesn't matter how many times you get that value, it is still inaccurate ;D

Validity is controlling variables. Think of sources of error in the experiments you are reading about/studying and propose ways they could be minimised (better equipment, different method, etc) :)

envisagator

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 92
  • Respect: +20
Re: HSC Physics Question Thread
« Reply #3417 on: June 24, 2018, 12:11:57 pm »
0
How do I go about assessing the validity of a statement e.g. "Electricity, as a form of energy, is good for killing people and little else" assess the vaidity of this statment??
2018 HSC: English Standard          Mathematics EXT 1,2          Physics          Engineering Studies

S200

  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1108
  • Yeah well that happened...
  • Respect: +244
Re: HSC Physics Question Thread
« Reply #3418 on: June 24, 2018, 06:57:58 pm »
-1
TBH it's pretty ****** obvious that this statement is erroneous...
I would just expound on the greatness of electricity, not discarding the fundamentalists, Tesla and Edison.
Carpe Vinum

\(\LaTeX\) - \(e^{\pi i }\)
#ThanksRui! - #Rui\(^2\) - #Jamon10000

5233718311 :D

blasonduo

  • Moderator
  • Forum Obsessive
  • *****
  • Posts: 405
  • Schrodinger waved while Heisenberg didn't?
  • Respect: +356
Re: HSC Physics Question Thread
« Reply #3419 on: June 25, 2018, 05:24:23 pm »
+4
How do I go about assessing the validity of a statement e.g. "Electricity, as a form of energy, is good for killing people and little else" assess the vaidity of this statment??

A statement is deemed valid when the conclusion the student draws upon follows current works or theories.

From the given statement, I see three distinct conclusions that the text draws upon;

1) Electricity is a form of energy
2) It is good for killing people
3) Its use is very limited

So in your response, you need to address each point individually and then as an overall conclusion.

Energy is the capacity to do work, electrical energy is the movement of electrons and thus contains kinetic energy. So the first statement is valid (although saying "electricity" isn't the best wording, but I'll assume that's fine :P )

It indeed has the ability to easily kill people, as little as 0.1 amps can stop the heart and has proven fatal. (This, however, is not assessed in HSC physics, so just acknowledging the fact that this statement holds some truth should be sufficient)

The last statement is probably the most critical aspect that cracks the validity, you should already know through the motors and generators topic, that electrical energy has huge uses. (globalisation, advanced medical equipment, more leisure through mechanical applications, etc...) use points such as these to prove that this point is indeed invalid.

Sum everything up, show that the statement has some truths, but overall does not have accurate conclusions and is thus invalid.

Hope this helps :)
2018: UNSW B science (physics)/B education

Kicking myself into gear

HSC Physics Topics 1 & 2 Exam!