Hi
With Trial Paper 2 next tuesday, I was wondering whether it is best for the Seven Judith Wright poems we must know for Module C People and Landscapes to focus on two or three, rather than all seven. Many people in my year have opted to just prepare for the two or three of their choice, so that we can have more depth in analysis per poem rather than having shallow and broad knowledge for all seven. Is this recommended? Or is this sacrificial of possible marks?
Thanks 
Erin
Hey Erin!! Welcome to the forums! Be sure to let me know if you need help finding anything

A bit of a complex issue there. Of course, you
should know all your poems in depth, not just three. That is obviously the better course of action, so the question turns into (I suppose), "Is it worth knowing all seven in depth?" A risk vs reward scenario

For starters, you don't want shallow knowledge of the poetry. If doing all seven poems means you'll not go into depth with them, then stick with 2 or 3. Depth is better than breadth in my opinion.
Module C will never specify use of a specific poem like Module B could, therefore, knowing 3 in depth
may be enough. That said, if you get a nasty question and you only have 3 poems, that drastically reduces the amount of evidence you have, so it is worth knowing all 7.
My recommendation would be,
if you don't have the time to analyse all 7 properly, pick three to analyse really really well. Then, do a more basic analysis of the remaining four. This is the best mix of both worlds and should prepare you more effectively for any doozy questions
