Hi elyse,
I need a lot of help with my newest assessment task.
But firstly I just want to ask how do i answer this question.
"It is perspectives about the conflict between the powerful and the powerless that makes texts of the period, after the bomb, especially significant."
Now i would obviously open my speech by saying, "perspectives about the conflict between the powerful and the powerless that makes texts of the period, after the bomb, especially significant because..." but i don't know what comes after because.
Texts: Waiting for Godot and Slaughterhouse Five
What i wanna do is show that initially people relegated all their moral responsibilities to institutions whether they be religious or political, and that is what Godot represents. However when no one comes this notion of blind transforms into nihilism but even then the populace is avoiding taking responsibility of their actions. Hence, Beckett reflects this lack of change through Waiting for Godot.
then with Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse Five, Vonnegut is highlighting society's fatalistic surrender. Billy Pilgrim’s strong beliefs in quietism and predestination represent the characteristic values of the After the Bomb society. Vonnegut uses Billy’s characterisation to expose the dangers associated with such beliefs. *ANALYSIS* Through Pilgrim’s nihilistic approach, Vonnegut creates an undeniable resonation of the wilful complacency of the 1960’s populace. Hence, the author highlights a drastic change in the ways of thinking after the bomb. Populace in the Cold War era inherited the philosophy that modern life is beyond the influence of responsible individuals. Through Pilgrim’s unconcerned attitude, the author deliberately incites frustration in the reader, thereby allowing Vonnegut to convey the on-going frustration he feels as a result of the deep rooted quietism in his contextual society. Ultimately, through the questioning of the inevitability of one’s life and free will Vonnegut expresses that, “death is inevitable, but some deaths are preventable, and the novel consistently demonstrates that human beings have the power to shape the present and the future.”
Essentially this suffering and quietism reflects a remaining vestigial hope for meaning during the Cold War Era, highlighting the populace's desire for hope and meaning.
I want to argue that the suffering of the populace i.e. the personal and philosophical paradigms are a direct result of "POWERLESS". And to do so, i will change the argument so that the quietism and predestination deeply instilled into the populace is a result of the government's unending exploitation and imposing of drastic conditions whether they be personally repressive or economically oppressive.
I have these ideas, but I need a better direction and I could really really use your help.
i meant that
I want to argue that the suffering of the populace i.e. the personal and philosophical paradigms are a direct result of "POWERFUL"'s abuse. And to do so, i will change the argument so that the quietism and predestination deeply instilled into the populace is a result of the government's unending exploitation and imposing of drastic conditions whether they be personally repressive or economically oppressive.
I have these ideas, but I need a better direction and I could really really use your help.
Mod: Merged double post. If you have an afterthought, you can click "modify" and add it into the original post 