VCE Specialist Mathematics - Question of the week threadAboutEvery week, three challenging mathematics questions will be posted here, for your nerdish enjoyment
Questions posted here are all accessible using Specialist Maths knowledge
that is, all accessible using specialist mathematics knowledge.... jk if you got what i mean!!.
Feel free to discuss solutions and post your answers here... solutions will be added at the end of each week, and new answers posted!
Think questions are too easy? too hard? Want a specific topic covered? Feedback is welcome in this thread as well!
Massive thanks to SlyDev for enabling inline \(\mathrm\LaTeX\) by the way!
Posting rulesTo keep it fair, answer posting is restricted to current Year 12 (or year 11s or really bright year 10s
, AND graduates who are
not pursuing higher-level mathematics. All you university maths nerds, feel free to offer 'hints' at your discretion, but spoiler tags
MUST be used to avoid giving it away!
Week 1 | Week 1 SolutionsSpoiler
Q1. Calculate the indefinite integral
by making an appropriate substitution for \(x\).
Full mathematical justification is required
Q2. Polar coordinates are defined as follows: \(x=r\cos(\theta), y=r\sin(\theta)\). For the polar graph \(r=10\sin(5\theta))\), find the gradient \(\dfrac{dy}{dx}\) when \(\theta = \dfrac{\pi}{10}\).
Q3. Using calculus, find an expression for a the volume of the truncated cone with minimal and maximal radii respectively \(q, r\), and height \(h\). Give your answer in the form \(\dfrac{a\pi}{b}\) where a and b are real expressions (that is, \(a, b \in \mathbf{R}\))
Week 2Spoiler
Q1. [Complex exponential] Euler's formula states that
Show that \(\sin(x) = \dfrac{e^{ix} - e^{-ix}}{2i} \text{ and } \cos(x) = \dfrac{e^{ix}+e^{-ix}}{2}\)
Using these results, write \(\cos^4(x)\) as a sum of cosines of integer multiples of x
Q2. A family of curves is called an orthogonal trajectory of another family of curves if each member of one family intersects at right angles with every member of the other family.
Find the orthogonal trajectories of the family of parabolas \(y^2=4ax\), i.e. the family of curves that have a gradient
perpendicular to the gradient of the ellipses at every point in the plane.
Q3. [Implicit differentiation]
Let us introduce the concept of partial derivatives. Take \(z = x^2+y^2+2xy\) for instance.
Then the partial derivative with respect to x is denoted
(i.e. differentiate with respect to x, treating y as a constant)
And the partial derivative with respect to y is denoted
(i.e. differentiate with respect to y, treating x as a constant)
Take the implicitly defined relation \(x^2-2xy+3y^2=2\). Find \(\dfrac{dy}{dx}\) using the method you learned in Specialist Maths.
The relation can be rearranged into the form \(F(x, y) = x^2-2xy+3y^2-2=0\). Find \(\dfrac{\partial F}{\partial x}\) and \(\dfrac{\partial F}{\partial y}\).
Hence show that \(\dfrac{dy}{dx} =- \dfrac{\dfrac{\partial F}{\partial x}}{\dfrac{\partial F}{\partial y}}\).
Try some other relations to convince yourself that this is generally true.
Week 3I thought I'd try a slightly easier question this week, as the response to previous questions hasn't been that hot (possibly because they're hard or advanced lol)
A particle has position: \(\vec{r}(t) = r\cos(\theta(t))\vec{i}+r\sin(\theta(t))\vec{j}\), where \(\theta(t)\) is some function. (This models a particle in
accelerating circular motion, with angular acceleration \(\alpha\),
not necessary for solving this question)
(a) Find \(\dot{\vec{r}}, \text{ and } \ddot{\vec{r}}\), the velocity and acceleration vectors.
(b) A result from VCE Physics (LOL) states that for
uniform circular motion, the velocity vector and the acceleration vector are
perpendicular. Show that if \(\theta(t) = \omega t\), (i.e. the motion is uniform), that \(\vec{v}\cdot\vec{a} = 0\).
(c) Given that \(\theta(t)\) is
any function (in which case the particle may be accelerating), find the scalar component of \(\vec{a}\) in the
radial direction(d) Hence, given that \(\theta(t) = \omega t\), show that the component of acceleration in the
radial direction is \(a_r = \omega^2 r\).
(e) Now, using \(\omega = \dot{\theta}\(t)\), show that the radial acceleration (i.e. towards the centre of the circle) is
still \(a_r = r[\omega(t)]^2\).
Have fun... and let me know if this is still too hard
Hopefully this is a bit of a more applied taste to the thread...
Not going to force people to post their working here, but let us know how you go. I'll stick up solutions for Week 2 and this question once I get around to it
This isn't a super hard question btw
§§§