out of curiosity, do you think it's better to work through the questions 'properly', and almost be sure you got the right answer (this may involve taking more time), which may result in not finishing the paper and just guessing the remaining ones...or actually work through it quickly so that you finish?
I know that there is an element of luck involved, especially with the guessing...but strategy wise, which do you think is better?
For what it's worth, I'll be working in an unstructured manner, hoping to spend no more than 3-4 mins on a single question (for section 3 and short section 1 questions... medentry is not a good source for section 1 questions, the passages are so long

). If I can't work it out, move on so that you can get others right. So, it's a mix of both since you have the time to be careful but you don't want to get one right (defs. right) and guess 4 or 5 because of the rush.
Also, are the questions jumbled up or still split in different sections but there's no longer a restriction about flipping to other sections like it was a few years back? This might affect my plan of just going through the first time and getting all section 2 questions done, then section 3 and finally section 1 questions if it's not jumbled up
