Hey guys

I noticed that I completely forgot to post my world order findings, so here they are.
I've only researched the the UN's response to contemporary issues (except for the conduct of hostilities) so far, so my evidence may be limited. Also, these developments might not exactly meet the criteria for
recent but I hope this helps anyway
R2P- Article 24 of the UN Charter places the UNSC in “primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security"
- Attempted resolutions in Syria have failed due to Russia's veto; In 2012, their use of a veto prohibited the ability for the UN to intervene, resulting in an increase of reported deaths by 5,000
- The Guardian's article 'Vetoed!' raises the question of whether veto powers are still relevant in the 21st century. It characterises the UNSC as "obsolete"
- Antonio Patriota, the representative of Brazil in the UN states that amendments must be made to “shape a security council that is truly in tune with the 21st century"
- Some success in the 2011 Libyan crisis. The passing of Resolutions 1970 and 1973 allowed the UN to impose no-fly zones and provide military assistance to protect Libyan citizens. As a result, the UN prevented the capture of major Libyan cities.
Regional and Global Situations that threaten peace and securityGlobal, the nuclear threat- Start 1 in 1991, effective in the disarmament of nuclear weapons between the US and Russia, allowing for a reduction of arsenals by 58,000
- The Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons 1968 (NPT) has allowed for the promotion of peaceful energy usage in an increasingly nuclear world.
- North Korea's withdrawal from the NPT highlights the unenforceability of international law. State sovereignty continues to be a barrier to world order
- The use of nuclear weapons has been deemed the “biggest threat to humanity” (Lawrence Krauss on BBC’s Q&A)
- North Korea has been characterised as a "rogue state" (Anthony Lake)
- North Korea's unwillingness to comply with international law is increasing the possibility for a "major conflict" (Donald Trump)
Regional, the US invasion of Iraq 2003
- The UN did not react to the US' illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003, despite the act being a breach of the UN Charter. Accordingly, the ICJ turned a “blind eye to one of the most blatant human rights abuses” (Jean Shaoul)
The success of global cooperation in achieving world orderThe East Timor Crisis
- The passing of Resolutions 1946 and 1964 allowed for humanitarian intervention to ensure a fair ballot process and a safe merge to a self-governing nation
- The creation of the the International Force for East Timor (INTERFET) placed diplomatic and military pressure on pro-Indian militias to cease their acts of aggression
There it is

As I said, some of them may not be
recent developments but they are definitely relevant to the course. I personally used all of these in my legal studies essay and they allowed for sophistication and a clear judgement of the positives and negatives of the UN.[/list][/list]