Thanks a lot! I'd really appreciate if you can post your timetable, would be helpful.
And yeah, I'm aware of the core content. It's actually why I decided not to do Biomed, as Maths is something I just can't deal with and I couldn't believe I could finally get rid of it after high school. If the outcome is the same, with many alumni telling me that they feel like Biomedicine just put extra stress on them and don't feel like they're more prepared for further study in fields like Medicine than their Science peers, may I ask why you chose to do Biomedicine? I'm sure you have your reasons.
Regarding majors, my question is: if we take the same majors and in turn the same subjects within that major, why can't we be in the same classes if they have the same exact subject codes?
Thanks a lot for the informative and quick responses, truly appreciated.
Semester 1, 2016 (1st year biomed)
Semester 1, 2017 (2nd year)
As you can see, 1st year 1st sem is pretty packed with compulsory classes/tutes and has lectures with non-negotiable times (which, as you can see, caused a clash in my timetable with german which I took for the day off). This also meant that I had more awkward gaps in my timetable. If you do biomed, you're basically forced to stay from 8am to 4:15-5pm because of the bio to chem lecture progression. I **THINK** that there is better flexibility in Science, where lectures are repeated at different times in a day to accomodate for people. This is a 'stream', as referred to by cassiecate. Streams don't exist in 1st year biomed apart from Physics 2 lectures, but I didn't do this subject so I can't say for sure. 2nd year is a bit better, where I can use Wed/Fri as days off by watching lectures at home, and I'm not forced to stay at uni from 8am to 5pm waiting for lectures, which I think is a real time killer, especially given I commute from very far away.
To be 100% candid with you, a lot of the time Biomed feels precisely like a restricted science degree that is made arbitrarily harder on the basis that that 'the cohort is smart, let's make it harder for them!'. This is especially true for biomed cores, where you can do identical work in Science without the added pain of squeezing two subjects into one semester or dealing with extra challenges. If you want to get a great GPA, it's (arguably) harder in biomed, but this is quite a trivial point. In fact, this is a pretty silly complaint overall, as you can't expect uni to be a walk in the park, and the content you learn is generally well-taught and interesting.
So to answer your question as to why I did Biomed > Science, there is no real definitive answer. I honestly was happy to do either, but I knew that I wanted to go into a career in the health sciences, so it just made sense at the time. Additionally, I wasn't too dissuaded by the compulsory maths subjects (in retrospect I would've preferred the freedom to do psych or s/t in Science instead) at the time, and I liked the idea of being in a close-knit cohort where I'd get to know people personally.
Re: majors - I think there was a miscommunication between us here. You can and will end up being in the same subjects (same classes, lectures, etc) if you're doing the same major sequence. However, biomed people generally don't do this until 3rd year. As you put it: same subject code, same subject.
Have a nice day.