Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

July 18, 2025, 06:13:32 pm

Author Topic: Inverse Functions Question; Discrete Maths  (Read 4625 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

FallonXay

  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 165
  • Respect: +6
Inverse Functions Question; Discrete Maths
« on: March 09, 2017, 07:56:07 pm »
0
Heyy, looking over my lecture notes/ doing homework for discrete maths and I'm pretty confused.

The lecture notes say that the inverse of f(x) = 2x - 5 is f-1(y) = (y + 5) / 2. Is it equivalent/ Would it be correct to say that the inverse of f(x) = 2x - 5 is f-1(x)= (x + 5) / 2.

So basically is  f-1(y) = (y + 5) / 2  = f-1(x)= (x + 5) / 2 . Or what's happening?  :o

Thanks.
« Last Edit: March 09, 2017, 07:58:04 pm by FallonXay »
HSC (2016): English Advanced || Mathematics || Mathematics: Extension 1 || Physics || Design and Technology || Japanese Beginners

University: B Science (Computer Science) @UNSW

jamonwindeyer

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 10149
  • The lurker from the north.
  • Respect: +3108
Re: Inverse Functions Question; Discrete Maths
« Reply #1 on: March 09, 2017, 08:08:33 pm »
+1
Hey! It's way more typical to use \(x\) as far as I know, but the form of the function is the same so I suppose it's practically equivalent! Like, a function is just a box that takes an input and gives an output. The pro numeral doesn't really affect that. So I'd say it's an unusual way to think of an inverse function, but I suppose it is the same ;D

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: Inverse Functions Question; Discrete Maths
« Reply #2 on: March 23, 2017, 06:41:55 pm »
+1
Hey! It's way more typical to use \(x\) as far as I know, but the form of the function is the same so I suppose it's practically equivalent! Like, a function is just a box that takes an input and gives an output. The pro numeral doesn't really affect that. So I'd say it's an unusual way to think of an inverse function, but I suppose it is the same ;D
Ah, sorry for the delayed reply but I will have to disagree here Jamon.

In MATH1081, and as far as all university maths courses are concerned, a function is defined usually by f: X->Y. That just means that the domain and codomain are specified. To distinguish between the fact that x is an element in the domain and y is an element in the codomain, by convention we take the pronumerals to be different.

I believe it is crucial to use a different variable for the inverse function f-1: Y->X