I find it hard to conceptualise all this jazz about driving and restraining forces in relation to benefits and outcomes of the change. I was hoping someone could just clarify this area for me, because from what I read, my teacher's notes and several of the course books conflict on this matter. To be specific, what is actually changing, the environment or the organisation itself? How are driving forces different from the benefits of the proposed change? Aren't the benefits driving forces in of themselves. Are the driving and restraining forces factors or purely stakholders? Why is initiating change proactive?
Thanks.
Infact both areas are changing. Organisational structure will be changed, as responsibilities, activities & such will be changed therefore the org. much confine to these. For change to be sucessful, it will need to impact on many internal aspects of the org. These internal impacts of change are facilities & technology, management structure, objectives, planning, management style, corporate culture, recruiting & training, & task.
I believe that change also effects the orgs environments as customers, suppliers, technology factors, competitors need to confine to those changes but thats what i think? so im not really sure bout the environments.
To answer your last question bout initiating change as being proactive, well if you look back to the definition of proactive : 'Antisipating events' & planning ahead for them, initiating change is like the owner has "kick start" the drive for change because they have maybe antisipated a trend, or a market problem, a customer demands etc.
hope that helped? lol