Just got my results from paper one and I'm not very happy. For the essay and creative, I got 13 which I was happy about but I got mediocre comments at best: 'a perceptive and sensitive response' and 'a very creative idea' respectively. Then in the reading section, I got 6, from 15 in task 1 to 6 in trials. I actually thought my analysis was better in trials. That's not me trying to be ostentatious, I was still expecting 11-12 because our first task was marked extremely kind. I was talking to other people and most thought the marking was appalling and completely inconsistent. I'll give you an example of my comments for one of the questions out of 3... '1'. Like cheers marker, really helpful. Other said they got 4/15 in the creative writing for task 1 and got 14/15 in trials for the same narrative. It's honestly infuriating as we had to do task 1 twice as people knew the questions beforehand and I got 12/15 for reading without finishing and only dropped marks on the one I didn't finish. I get better feedback from the AN community who do it for free than I do from external markers getting paid $80/h. Anyway, that's my rant, hopefully everyone else had better markers and in turn got reasonable marks.