What do you think about the whole thing Joseph41? Or knowing you have an interest in linguistics, can you add to the exploration of the D & C comparison in their forcefulness/offensiveness? Haven't read the entire thread. Pretty exhausted rn, so apologies for poor expression etc.
On particular swear words - there's some I will never use. I never use s**t, I think it comes from a deeply gendered and oppressive place and there's just no need. However, I do really enjoy observing Amber Rose's annual Slut Walk, which is all about reclaiming sexuality and channeling the word to be no longer an insult. Other racially or sexually charged derogatory words I won't use either. I'm similar to this. Never use
slut , never use
cunt , never use
nigger , and so on. I swear a lot, but I swear for emphasis and expression; these words, I feel, go beyond that. Why? Because as you've alluded to, they come from a place of discrimination. It's the same reason I hate the expression "that's so gay"; even if not specifically referring to the LGBTQIA+ community,
gay is being used to describe something bad, and obviously those flow-on effects could be pretty severe. I don't give a fuck about words like
fuck ; I actually think it's a particularly useful, diverse word. I love it, tbh - one of my favourites. But when any language is founded on hatred or discrimination, I feel uncomfortable.
What really gets me bothered, is men saying "girls shouldn't swear" or "I don't like when girls swear." Agree. Don't see how gender is relevant in the discussion. I'd imagine this is based on stereotypical notions of masculinity and femininity - obviously not always reflected in reality.
Regarding
dick ,
cunt and so on, semantic deterioration has occurred in conjunction with femaleness for a very, very long time. Generally, the "female version" of words is marked - the "male version" is considered neutral. For example,
host (unmarked, male) and
hostess (marked, female). There are consequences of this in isolation, but these are tangential, so I won't go into them here.
Such deterioration is probably best noted in linguistic pairs that once were level in terms of prestige or whatever. Something like
lady -
lord . The former isn't exactly prestigious these days. In fact, as noted
here , you can have things like a cleaning lady. But would you ever have a cleaning lord? No, certainly not. The "female" iteration here has deteriorated; the "male" version has not. There are many similar examples.
Even something like
hussy 'an impudent or immoral girl or woman' . From where did that derive? It was a contraction of
housewife - again, obvious semantic deterioration.
With that in mind, I don't find it surprising that
cunt at the moment seems to be one of the most potent words. But even
cunt isn't as potent as it once was. This is to be expected. Typically, swear words are those that have the ability to shock or offend - they have potency other words don't. Of course, these words change over time, largely based on taboos of the time. "Swear words" back in the day were largely religious; over time, they've become more sexual; presently, a lot of swear words are based on "-ist language" (sexist, racist, homophobic and so on). In the future, who knows? It'll be centred on future taboos.
This sort of phenomenon is known as the swearing treadmill; a similar thing exists with euphemism. When we use swear words more and more, they become commonplace. And as a result, they lose some of their potency. Words like
bloody and
crap used to be very taboo. Are they now? Nah, not really. That moved on to
shit ("the s word"), then
fuck ("the f word"), and now
cunt ("the c word").
Cunt will soon be replaced, though, because it's becoming more and more common in everyday language. Soon we'll see it more on the media and, over time, it'll diminish in potency.
This article here by my academic hero (linguist Kate Burridge) is a great read if you're interested. If you can't be fucked, here are some relevant excerpts:
Cunt has a good pedigree with related forms in Old Norse kunta , Old Frisian and Middle Low German kunte , and Middle Dutch conte . Surprisingly it’s not attested in Old English, except in place names like cuntan heale (literally, “cunt hollow”).By Middle English the word is making regular public appearances. Early medical texts have descriptions like "wymmen the necke of the bladdre is schort, & is maad fast to the cunte”. Included among the 4,000 vulgarisms in Captain Frances Grose’s Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue (first published in 1785) is the entry c**t, with the telling definition “a nasty word for a nasty thing”. Cunt had well and truly fallen into the semantic abyss, and it took innocent bystanders with it. The old word for “rabbit” coney (rhyming with honey) dropped out of use because (as one lexicographer delicately put it) it took on “inappropriate anatomical significance”. In some places it lingered longer because of a clever vowel change (think of Coney Island). I’m sure taboo association is one of the reasons King Cnut’s name transformed to Canute – people in the 18th century could transpose the letters of Cnut, just as we transpose the letters of FCUK.When blasphemous and religiously profane language was no longer considered offensive (at least by a majority of speakers), more physically and sexually based expressions filled the gap.Cunt was among the earliest of such terms to be pressed into maledictory service in the second half of the 19th century. Its taboo quality enabled speakers to let off steam, abuse, offend – and express mateship and endearment (the more affectionate the feeling, the more abusive the language; for example “wookey is a gem, love that cunt”). Emotional expressions lose their sting with frequent use, but it is also that sex and bodily functions are no longer tabooed as they were in the 19th and early 20th centuries. Free-to-air television now frequently includes words such as fuck and cunt , and their social acceptance explains why courts now typically dismiss obscene language charges. So the force of cunt has weakened considerably. The recent addition of derived forms cunty , cuntish , cunted , cunting to the Oxford English Dictionary barely raised an eyebrow. But the word still provides that bonus layer of emotional intensity and added capacity to offend. Of the taboo terms for bodily functions, sex and private parts (now there’s a nice euphemism), cunt remains the most disturbing and the most powerful, which is a fall-out of the strength of the original taboos. And here you’ll find revealing asymmetries. As my colleague Keith Allan pointed out in his account of bawdy part terms, there’s a vast difference in wounding capacity between expressions of abuse invoking male and female sex organs. Prick means “stupid, contemptible”, whereas cunt means “nasty, malicious, despicable”. Males can be abused by prick and dick but females rarely, if ever (how does “She’s a prick” strike you?). On the other hand, cunt and its gentler counterparts twat and prat freely apply to both males and females. It’s a familiar story — general terms for women are insulting when used of men – for example, calling a man a “girl”, “old woman” or “sissy” – but there’s no real abuse if male-associated words are used of women. Anyway, I swear a lot - probably an increasing amount, because I find it useful. I don't believe there to be any negative correlation with intelligence. I don't see how "I've had a fucking shit day" is inherently worse (or better) than "I've had an absolutely terrible day". The structure of the sentence is the same; some of the words have just been replaced with alternatives.
My English Language teacher showed me this video back in the day. It summarises my thoughts on the word
fuck pretty nicely.
Content warning: swearing. VIDEO
P.S. I fucking love linguistics.