So does that mean everything below 86 gets scaled down really low? If so, what band?
Ok so with scaling, well here are a few pointers from what I understand that hopefuly calrifies it a bit:
First 2 are done by NESA:
SO you get a mark on the exam (raw mark) and this mark determines (not really sure how- maybe the scaling that i will mention soon) but is probably not the "Examination Mark" written on your results
This is commonly thought of as 50% of the hsc mark.
1. The other 50% is your Assessment (internal mark) which is MODERATED based on your rank within your school and by how much those ranks differ (e.g. if number one is 90 and you are 89 and second then you will not be impacted too badly) and is also based on your examination mark.
2. There is another process called ALIGNING which compares cohorts. So if NESA think standards of responses are good, then everyone gets shifted up. This means accelerants will not be dogged if an exam is easier the next year, because getting a 95 in one year is made to be the same as a different year.
The last thing which is the actual SCALING is done by UAC
3. Scaling is done to compare different subjects. UAC looks at all the different subjects a student does that business kids do and sees how they perform in them. So if the students to bad in other subjects, business will scale down because this gives the impression that it is an easier subject. And obviously vise versa, so for 4U maths, students doing it ace everything else but get low mark in that, must mean it is hard, so it scales a crap tone UP. Scaling is done to the raw examination mark (I think).
Don't worry too much about these processes because at the end of the day it is out of contorl. But a higher external raw mark is critical to doing well overall and so is a good internal rank. When I say 86, that is my opinion for guaranteed band 6, but maybe 84? really depends