My intro usually starts off with very vague statements that make links with the outside world, so I'm just wondering if I'm going off topic with my pieces by doing this.
e.g. prompt: What role does fate play in Burial Rites?
paragraph starter: Many choose to believe in fate, as it shifts the blame of a life gone wrong from themselves to factors outside of their control (this sounds a lot more off topic than my usual sentence starters, but you get the jist of it)
Hi pha

I'd strongly encourage you to steer clear of these
very vague statements. Although the first line of the introduction can be used for contextualisation purposes, it must still intimately engage with elements of the prompt. A potential issue with the sample start you've provided, is that it does not relate to the world of the text. It is more of a generalised, didactic assertion that could relate to you, me, or someone else. Examiners are interested in seeing how you've pulled out the
implications of the prompt (enough so that you can entwine them in a tightly relevant, contextualising statement).
For example (
Medea is a cautionary tale about being consumed by emotion. Discuss):
Euripides’ tragedy
Medea seeks to examine the human psyche and explore how extreme emotions motivate a perilously frail state of being.
Can you see the way I'm connecting the overarching implications of the prompt and linking them to the bounds of the text?
Hopefully this helps!