Hi,
So after completing two SACs/ACs i've come to realise that my commentaties aren't cohesive at all (the writing doesn't flow), like they sound repetitive and like i've just randomly inserted a quote and then a metalinguistic label so and as a result my SAC scores are only slightly higher than the average mark in the cohort which is slightly concerning as we are more than halfway through Yr 12.... However, the even more concerning problem is that my writing hasn't ever been cohesive in any type of writing, so what would be the best way in order to improve the 'cohesiveness' of my writing and how to sound as if i'm not just 'trying to fill in the paragraphs' for an AC as i am genuinely concerned and don't want to fail EL as i'm only doing one english subject.
Here's an excerpt of an AC i did for reference: The use of front focus, prevalent in the first line, 'Michael Crouch' allows the writer to encapsulate the audience thereby bringing more prominence to the nature of the text being an obituary . However as the text continues it is evident that the text relies on anaphoric referencing as the majority of the follow sentences begin with 'he' (4).The variety of lexical choices such as the use of synonymy, such as the positive adjectives; 'supporter(3), contributor (21) and 'committed'(33) helps to demonstrate Crouch's significance by effectively linking the words together to propagate his influence throughout the text. Throughout the text, the use pronouns such as 'he'(30) and 'his'(39) enable the writer to effectively avoid the constant repetition of Crouch's name thus making the text more cohesive. The use of listing, especially prevalent in line 15, 'Youth employment, Indigenous health…' helps to clearly describe his efforts and contributions towards the community.
Cheers!