Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

May 02, 2026, 04:31:02 pm

Author Topic: Integers  (Read 1320 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

NE2000

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1221
  • living an alternate reality
  • Respect: +4
Integers
« on: October 29, 2009, 10:42:49 am »
0
Z or J and why?  :-\
2009: English, Specialist Math, Mathematical Methods, Chemistry, Physics

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Integers
« Reply #1 on: October 29, 2009, 11:41:37 am »
0
denotes integers.

(according to wikipedia), denotes irrational numbers.

and I *think* denotes integers... confusing huh.
denotes reals, but so does
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

humph

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1437
  • Respect: +16
Re: Integers
« Reply #2 on: October 29, 2009, 01:10:35 pm »
0
In common academic practice (i.e. formal mathematics papers, books, research, etc.), you use to denote the natural numbers, to denote the integers, to denote the rational numbers, to denote the real numbers, and to denote the complex numbers. Occasionally you might see instead, but this isn't particularly common (though I've seen people like Terry Tao use it all the time, so it's certainly not unheard of). However, I've never seen used to mean the same thing. In general the caligraphic style isn't used to describe such subsets of the complex numbers.
As the irrationals are much less important than these sets, they usually are just written , although I have seen them written as both and .

All that being said, I seem to remember using the notation to denote the integers in spec exams back in the day, so maybe that's the standard in spec. Check your textbook perhaps? Whatever they use there will definitely be accepted by examiners.
VCE 2006
PhB (Hons) (Sc), ANU, 2007-2010
MPhil, ANU, 2011-2012
PhD, Princeton, 2012-2017
Research Associate, University College London, 2017-2020
Assistant Professor, University of Virginia, 2020-

Feel free to ask me about (advanced) mathematics.

NE2000

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1221
  • living an alternate reality
  • Respect: +4
Re: Integers
« Reply #3 on: October 29, 2009, 01:22:58 pm »
0
Yeah I've got two different textbooks and they use different ones. If beyond the VCE you use Z then they can't say no to that I guess. Thanks.
2009: English, Specialist Math, Mathematical Methods, Chemistry, Physics

ryley

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 239
  • Respect: +2
Re: Integers
« Reply #4 on: October 29, 2009, 01:30:51 pm »
0
I think I've always used Z for integers and my teacher has never corrected me. Just another quick notation question, is it alright/aceptable to write "ln" to represent the natural logarithm?
2008: 3/4: Biology[41]
2009: 3/4: English[37], Chemistry[43], Methods(CAS)[46], Physics[39], Specialist[46]
ENTER: 98.85
B.Sc(Applied Maths) @ Melbourne Uni

GerrySly

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 790
  • Respect: +5
Re: Integers
« Reply #5 on: October 29, 2009, 02:26:56 pm »
0
I think I've always used Z for integers and my teacher has never corrected me. Just another quick notation question, is it alright/aceptable to write "ln" to represent the natural logarithm?
I been told to use when you have a variable in brackets and ln when it is just a number
VCE 2009
English, Methods, Specialist, IT: Software Development, Religion & Society, French

ryley

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 239
  • Respect: +2
Re: Integers
« Reply #6 on: October 29, 2009, 03:26:16 pm »
0
Ok, thanks for clarifying, but I wonder why that is?
2008: 3/4: Biology[41]
2009: 3/4: English[37], Chemistry[43], Methods(CAS)[46], Physics[39], Specialist[46]
ENTER: 98.85
B.Sc(Applied Maths) @ Melbourne Uni

humph

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1437
  • Respect: +16
Re: Integers
« Reply #7 on: October 29, 2009, 07:28:24 pm »
0
Weird. is pretty common notation, but yeah you often also see or even to mean the same thing. I wouldn't use the last one in VCE though because they tend to be pretty anal about making sure you denote the base of the logarithm somehow.
VCE 2006
PhB (Hons) (Sc), ANU, 2007-2010
MPhil, ANU, 2011-2012
PhD, Princeton, 2012-2017
Research Associate, University College London, 2017-2020
Assistant Professor, University of Virginia, 2020-

Feel free to ask me about (advanced) mathematics.