Login

Search the forums now!

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

August 24, 2025, 05:15:25 pm
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down

Author Topic: How did everyone think they went in English?  (Read 15821 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

hxleong

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 24
  • Yay Telemann
Re: How did everyone think they went in English?
« Reply #45 on: October 31, 2009, 10:14:35 am »
Quote from: green04 on October 31, 2009, 09:27:53 am
yooo,  for the lang. analysis did people analyse the picture?

Yeah I did but I related it to other stuff so it sort of made sense...  :-\

and The Imaginative Landscape.
ARGH!!!!!  >:(
I really dislike my school for picking that context. Worst Imaginative Landscape prompt ever!!!!
(For an exam anyway)
Logged

green04

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: How did everyone think they went in English?
« Reply #46 on: October 31, 2009, 10:19:07 am »
hrm i wrote bout how with seach engines like google we dnt necessarily need brains anymore because internet & tech. does it for you,
what did u write?

Quote from: hxleong on October 31, 2009, 10:14:35 am
Quote from: green04 on October 31, 2009, 09:27:53 am
yooo,  for the lang. analysis did people analyse the picture?

Yeah I did but I related it to other stuff so it sort of made sense...  :-\

Logged

maine

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 77
  • Mablecake
Re: How did everyone think they went in English?
« Reply #47 on: November 01, 2009, 05:51:52 pm »
Concerning the visual.
I wrote about how the future we will be better connected to the vast knowledge on the internet, thus reiterating voxi's point of us becoming supersayians (sic)
Logged
2008
Maths Methods CAS: 33=>40 =D
Legal studies: 33=> 31 =C
2009
English
Spesh
Chem
Economics
Accounting

spizaa #5

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 68
  • balls, composure, discipline
Re: How did everyone think they went in English?
« Reply #48 on: November 01, 2009, 06:36:09 pm »
ross huggard and moshi i did the first topic for hard times also..was a fairly standard question
i did my 1st para on sissy helping louisa, banishing harthouse etc. and last one on sleary helping tom escape to liverpool and quotes like "you mutht have uth" (individuals) and 2 middle paragraphs on the institutions of school (gradgrind and his effects on his own kids and pupils) and unions/places of employment via the unfortunate life of blackpool, so how he asks bounderby about divorce and helps the people who ostrascised him from the union without counting the cost
Logged
2008: methods: 37
2009: english: 50, legal: 45, chem: 40, eco: 37, spec: 32
ENTER: 98.70
2010: biomed/law @ monash

Trent

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 113
Re: How did everyone think they went in English?
« Reply #49 on: November 01, 2009, 06:42:24 pm »
Who wrote on 'Look Both Ways'? and which question did you do?
Logged
2008: Geography [42] Revolutions [38]
2009: English [40] Literature [38] Psychology [36] International Studies [33]
ENTER: 93.75

maine

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 77
  • Mablecake
Re: How did everyone think they went in English?
« Reply #50 on: November 01, 2009, 06:47:55 pm »

Quote from: Trent on November 01, 2009, 06:42:24 pm
Who wrote on 'Look Both Ways'? and which question did you do?

I did the iner lives of people and crapped on about their living spaces and the animations and the weather
you?
Logged
2008
Maths Methods CAS: 33=>40 =D
Legal studies: 33=> 31 =C
2009
English
Spesh
Chem
Economics
Accounting

Trent

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 113
Re: How did everyone think they went in English?
« Reply #51 on: November 01, 2009, 07:04:39 pm »
Quote from: maine on November 01, 2009, 06:47:55 pm
I did the iner lives of people and crapped on about their living spaces and the animations and the weather
you?

I did the other one actually, I am better at character discussion rather than structure etc even though it was our SAC question.

Did you think both questions were relatively easy?
Logged
2008: Geography [42] Revolutions [38]
2009: English [40] Literature [38] Psychology [36] International Studies [33]
ENTER: 93.75

ross huggard

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 90
  • i love maths.
Re: How did everyone think they went in English?
« Reply #52 on: November 01, 2009, 07:06:22 pm »
the LBW questions were piss easy..
people at my school chose to do it instead of hard times during the exam without any study
Logged

Trent

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 113
Re: How did everyone think they went in English?
« Reply #53 on: November 01, 2009, 07:34:34 pm »
Haha, that doesn't surprise me. It really surprised me how basic they were.
Logged
2008: Geography [42] Revolutions [38]
2009: English [40] Literature [38] Psychology [36] International Studies [33]
ENTER: 93.75

ross huggard

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 90
  • i love maths.
Re: How did everyone think they went in English?
« Reply #54 on: November 01, 2009, 07:49:29 pm »
plus one of them was almost exactly the same to our SAC prompt i think
Logged

geeza23

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 76
Re: How did everyone think they went in English?
« Reply #55 on: November 03, 2009, 02:57:04 pm »
oh thats good as haha lol at ur name ross huggard
Logged
2008
Chinese SLA - 40

2009
ESL                  - 43+
Accounting        - 38+
Math Methods    - 34+
Physics             - 20+
Specialist           - 20+

hopefully enter of 95.20 and above

Ilovemathsmeth

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1370
Re: How did everyone think they went in English?
« Reply #56 on: November 26, 2009, 04:41:46 pm »
Language analysis was pretty bad :(
Logged
Raw Scores:
Psychology 50 | Mathematical Methods 49 | Further Mathematics 49 | Accounting 49 | Chemistry 44 | English 43
ATAR: 99.75
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up