Login

Search the forums now!

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 22, 2025, 08:21:57 am
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Down

Author Topic: How did everyone think they went in English?  (Read 16318 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

xXNovaxX

  • Guest
Re: How did everyone think they went in English?
« Reply #15 on: October 30, 2009, 01:34:17 pm »
Quote from: methodsboy on October 30, 2009, 01:32:02 pm
i said it was enthusiastic as the guy was a enthusiast of digital technology.
btw, Voxi was the writer/blogger right?
yeah!!! I was thinking he was like an alias/ blogger dude, wish he had a last name, hated that I kept using "voxi, voxi, voxi, the writer" etc

and btw I forgot to rite backgorund info on the issue =(, is that bad =(
Logged

phanphy

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 92
Re: How did everyone think they went in English?
« Reply #16 on: October 30, 2009, 01:36:48 pm »
I did In the Lake of the Woods.. prompts were much better than 2008
Context -> Conflict. also not too bad.
Lang An, article and image sucked! but was aight :P

SO RELIEVED TO FINISH
Logged
2008: Classical Societies and Cultures
2009: Accounting, English, Legal, Further, Methods
2010: Commerce/Law @ Monash

TonyHem

  • Guest
Re: How did everyone think they went in English?
« Reply #17 on: October 30, 2009, 01:40:32 pm »
Quote from: xXNovaxX on October 30, 2009, 01:34:17 pm
Quote from: methodsboy on October 30, 2009, 01:32:02 pm
i said it was enthusiastic as the guy was a enthusiast of digital technology.
btw, Voxi was the writer/blogger right?
yeah!!! I was thinking he was like an alias/ blogger dude, wish he had a last name, hated that I kept using "voxi, voxi, voxi, the writer" etc

and btw I forgot to rite backgorund info on the issue =(, is that bad =(

wtf? no background information.
I think that's an instant fail

haha no just kidding, cant be that bad.
Logged

Ilovemathsmeth

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1370
Re: How did everyone think they went in English?
« Reply #18 on: October 30, 2009, 01:52:15 pm »
Did Whose Reality.

Hard Times, topic I.

Language Analysis was retarded. What did people say for the visual?? Seriously why was it so long???
Logged
Raw Scores:
Psychology 50 | Mathematical Methods 49 | Further Mathematics 49 | Accounting 49 | Chemistry 44 | English 43
ATAR: 99.75

xXNovaxX

  • Guest
Re: How did everyone think they went in English?
« Reply #19 on: October 30, 2009, 01:54:11 pm »
Quote from: Ilovemathsmeth on October 30, 2009, 01:52:15 pm
Did Whose Reality.

Hard Times, topic I.

Language Analysis was retarded. What did people say for the visual?? Seriously why was it so long???
I think they did it LONG to compensate for not havign TWO articles. Thats what I immediately thoguht when i saw it

hahah, as soon as reading time started i flicked to see if there was a VISUAL with the CONTEXT

and if tehre ere 2 articles for analysis, xD

LOVE YOU VCAA!!!!!!!

hope my marks are good though!
Logged

phanphy

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 92
Re: How did everyone think they went in English?
« Reply #20 on: October 30, 2009, 02:01:31 pm »
On the exam covers which were released a while ago, on section C it said something about analysing the "article"
so it was right about only one article!
Logged
2008: Classical Societies and Cultures
2009: Accounting, English, Legal, Further, Methods
2010: Commerce/Law @ Monash

xXNovaxX

  • Guest
Re: How did everyone think they went in English?
« Reply #21 on: October 30, 2009, 02:05:32 pm »
Quote from: phanphy on October 30, 2009, 02:01:31 pm
On the exam covers which were released a while ago, on section C it said something about analysing the "article"
so it was right about only one article!
lol i said that before....oh sorry, mgiht have been in the OTEHR english exam trhead of 2009, my bad
Logged

JakeRozen

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: How did everyone think they went in English?
« Reply #22 on: October 30, 2009, 02:09:50 pm »
I did the desensitisation question.
Yes to all those wondering what it meant, it was a lack of showing sensitivity.
Went okay in A & B, wasn't too sure about C though, especially the fact that it was one article. >_>
Logged
In order to achieve, sacrifice must be made.

derivativex

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 127
Re: How did everyone think they went in English?
« Reply #23 on: October 30, 2009, 02:34:25 pm »
Quote from: xXNovaxX on October 30, 2009, 01:34:17 pm
Quote from: methodsboy on October 30, 2009, 01:32:02 pm
i said it was enthusiastic as the guy was a enthusiast of digital technology.
btw, Voxi was the writer/blogger right?
yeah!!! I was thinking he was like an alias/ blogger dude, wish he had a last name, hated that I kept using "voxi, voxi, voxi, the writer" etc

and btw I forgot to rite backgorund info on the issue =(, is that bad =(

You should be fine.  Giving background information only aims to fulfill the mark descriptor:
"understanding of the ideas and points of view presented"

If you've made it clear that you understand the role of technology in society and how people can view it then you'll be fine.
Logged
VCE 2009
ENTER: 97.05
Subjects: English 44>[43.99] Literature 42>[43.23] History: Revolutions 42>[43.59] Pyschology 41>[40.52] Methods 32>[38.24] Legal Studies 37>[36.21]

i.am.amanda

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 44
Re: How did everyone think they went in English?
« Reply #24 on: October 30, 2009, 02:46:31 pm »
I did desensitisation for Generals as well. I talked about their being a much broader meaning to the novel than them simply being 'desensitised' in order to deal with war, and pointed out that though they were 'desentitised' (I changed it to 'neglect' or 'ingore their conditions') in some respects, they were still affected emotionally (narrator reaction to killing Karl), and physically (unrelentling lice, etc.)

I think I went a bit off track...
Logged

ReVeL

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 972
Re: How did everyone think they went in English?
« Reply #25 on: October 30, 2009, 02:58:18 pm »
Just out of interest, what was the Encountering Conflict prompt?
Logged
||  2008 VCE Graduate  ||  BCom @ UoM [Accounting & Finance Majors] - Completing 3rd year  ||

ross huggard

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 90
  • i love maths.
Re: How did everyone think they went in English?
« Reply #26 on: October 30, 2009, 03:56:16 pm »
did anyone do hard times?
the first one was very nice i thought..
just talked about coketown, the education system and slipped the legal system in.
then talked about louisa, jane and sissy, as well as rachael and stephen
i liked it.

whose reality prompt was good too.. unprecedently broad:)
Logged

andrew4443

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 66
Re: How did everyone think they went in English?
« Reply #27 on: October 30, 2009, 03:56:47 pm »
Quote from: phanphy on October 30, 2009, 01:36:48 pm
I did In the Lake of the Woods.. prompts were much better than 2008
Context -> Conflict. also not too bad.
Lang An, article and image sucked! but was aight :P

SO RELIEVED TO FINISH
What topic did you do for INTLOW?. I did the first one, the only idea I could come up with is that the suspense is caused by the manipulation/uncertainty of truth
Logged

rajah21

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 69
Re: How did everyone think they went in English?
« Reply #28 on: October 30, 2009, 04:05:03 pm »
Quote from: ReVeL on October 30, 2009, 02:58:18 pm
Just out of interest, what was the Encountering Conflict prompt?

"It is the victims of conflict who show us what is really important."
Logged
2008: Biology 44
2009: Religion and Society 38 || English 44 || Mathematical Methods 44 || Chemistry 46 || Indonesian SL 48
ENTER: 98.85

Pezza

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: How did everyone think they went in English?
« Reply #29 on: October 30, 2009, 07:41:29 pm »
Best word for tone in the language analysis was "optimistic"
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Up