Essentially, the title. English is a subject that I’ve enjoyed and done well in all my life, until Unit 3/4. As a Lit 1/2 student, I was told to do pick it up without doing the 1/2, as it would be “easy for me.” Naively, I believed that it would be, and then I received a complete shock when I was handed back my SAC grades - 66% for my first one, 57.5% for the second. I did “above average” for both, as my school is quite harsh with its marking, but receiving the lowest grades I’ve ever had in English for my Unit 3 I really stunned me.
After receiving my results, I went to my teacher and received detailed feedback for both SACs that I took notes on and plan to implement. So I now know what to improve on, and this certainly isn’t a doom post, but I just feel so angry and frustrated with myself for making mistakes that I quite literally detailed in my (language analysis SAC) plan to avoid, and then proceeded to make in the actual essay itself - the pressure of writing under time made my mind a bit loopy and I forgot to be specific about audience, even though I wrote 6 different types of audiences in my plan and said I would analyse the “multifaceted audience” in my topic sentence…my teacher said it was clear I knew what needed to be done but just struggled with the timed conditions, but gahhh I want to go back in time and slap myself for such a silly mistake

Thus far, I’ve done 2 Unit 3 SACs collectively worth 35/100% out of the 50% that SACs contribute to my English study score. So I know that hope isn’t lost yet, and I’m certainly going to put in the effort to do better, but as pitiful as it sounds, I’d like to hear some encouragement and words of advice? Maybe perspective from students who had a bad SAC mark that discouraged them, but then went on to do really well? I’m trying to resist the temptation to ask if a 40+ is still achievable with such dismal SAC marks, but any stories from students who were in similar straits and still did well would make me smile. Thank you for taking the time to read this post