Login

Search the forums now!

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 28, 2025, 01:17:05 am
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 11   Go Down

Author Topic: How did you go?  (Read 39810 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

johnbpj

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 14
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #15 on: November 10, 2009, 05:58:27 pm »
I thought the exam was pretty reasonable, I answered mostly everything confidently. I think that it could possibly be easier than last years. These are my answers to the multichoice questions, i checked with my teacher and hopefully only got 2-3 wrong.
1.D, 2A, 3D, 4A, 5C (this one is wrong), 6C, 7C, 8A, 9A, 10D, 11B (this one is wrong), 12B, 13D, 14C, 15A, 16D, 17B, 18B, 19A, 20B
Logged

billz1508

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 130
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #16 on: November 10, 2009, 05:59:13 pm »
pretty sure didnt have ':'   didnt say justifys or explain did it? i thought it just said explain how it demonstrates and effect. or something..
Logged

plumbob

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #17 on: November 10, 2009, 06:00:38 pm »
Don't quote me on the ':'
I could be wayy off.

But oh well, the exam is over, we all did our best
Logged

crappy

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 781
  • ‎
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #18 on: November 10, 2009, 06:02:06 pm »
For two hours of study throughout the whole year, Im pretty sure I just managed a pass.
Logged
ElectricalEng@Monash (2nd year)

Deon

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #19 on: November 10, 2009, 06:03:27 pm »
Piss easy. Easiest exam I've done.

Mind you.. I work in IT ;-)
Logged

Vadnal

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 234
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #20 on: November 10, 2009, 06:04:11 pm »
I'm pretty sure the A+ cutoff will be much lower for this exam.
Logged
2009: IT Applications
2010: Chemistry | Literature | Methods (CAS) | Physical Education | Health and Human Development
ATAR required: 86, ATAR aim: 90+

majo

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 39
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #21 on: November 10, 2009, 06:05:21 pm »
i found it easier than 08
« Last Edit: November 10, 2009, 06:27:15 pm by majo »
Logged

auzi_wayne

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #22 on: November 10, 2009, 06:10:36 pm »
The exam was VERY average.....they put alot of questions about databases and excel, some of the M.C were crazy, WTF @ the Milestone question
Logged

codykm

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #23 on: November 10, 2009, 06:11:58 pm »
Yeah I found that exam a lot harder then 07 and 08, was really pissed off. Some of those multiple choice question were fucked. I should get an A+ though, thats all I'm hoping.

Also, posting 'easy' is just arrogant, how would you like it if you fucked up and then someone came on here saying 'that was piss easy'
Logged

Rockim

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #24 on: November 10, 2009, 06:13:26 pm »
i feel bad.......
Logged

Potter

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 148
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #25 on: November 10, 2009, 06:17:02 pm »
That one-to many relationship MCQ tripped me out..
Logged
2009-  IT: Applications [40]

2010- English | Specialist | Methods | Chem | MUEP Chem |

2011- ...Lets see where this road will take me.

billz1508

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 130
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #26 on: November 10, 2009, 06:17:41 pm »
i think it was too much common sense which ended up confusing me when trying to answer, as im like no that is too easy and not relating to much to i.t... ahwell.. best of luck :)
Logged

majo

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 39
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #27 on: November 10, 2009, 06:26:04 pm »
Quote from: Potter on November 10, 2009, 06:17:02 pm
That one-to many relationship MCQ tripped me out..
pretty sure it was one field to many records, but im not sure, its a very weird question!
« Last Edit: November 10, 2009, 06:30:06 pm by majo »
Logged

paul anka

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 44
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #28 on: November 10, 2009, 06:29:43 pm »
Quote from: majo on November 10, 2009, 06:26:04 pm
Quote from: Potter on November 10, 2009, 06:17:02 pm
That one-to many relationship MCQ tripped me out..
pretty sure it was one field to many records

but the book said its record to record
Logged

majo

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 39
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #29 on: November 10, 2009, 06:32:47 pm »
yeah i think ur right!

what did people say for the question where the macro had the if statement in it. That one connfused me!

the design tool one?
« Last Edit: November 10, 2009, 06:38:36 pm by majo »
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 11   Go Up