Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 23, 2025, 05:21:13 pm

Author Topic: TT's Maths Thread  (Read 146011 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #660 on: January 09, 2010, 06:09:58 pm »
0
u could do an proof  ;D

The idea behind that is that if we compute values for x-values below -0.5, we can make less than any desired positive value. Ie we can minimize the 'approximation error' as much as we like.
« Last Edit: January 09, 2010, 06:22:45 pm by kamil9876 »
Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #661 on: January 09, 2010, 06:22:37 pm »
0
lol kk how about



If



But I sketched the graph of , there is no graph on the right side of 0...



nvm I got it, it was cause the graph was y = 0 lolz
« Last Edit: January 09, 2010, 08:25:20 pm by TrueTears »
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #662 on: January 09, 2010, 09:12:35 pm »
0


Book says it's undefined.

Shouldn't it be 0?

Since:
« Last Edit: January 09, 2010, 09:28:37 pm by TrueTears »
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #663 on: January 09, 2010, 09:31:41 pm »
0


Book says it's undefined.

Shouldn't it be 0?

Since:

Does the question have absolute signs?
Nah just the floor function.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #664 on: January 09, 2010, 09:37:28 pm »
0
book is right only limit from the positive side is 0. Limit from the negative side is -1  since for all x such that the   so -1 is the greatest integer less than it. (rememebr, the value at x=0 is irrelevant to the limit).
No it is still 0 from the left.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #665 on: January 09, 2010, 09:44:12 pm »
0
ahh eyah shit i was thinking of sinx since it would be correct for that one :P. Yeah you are correct they're wrong.
Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #666 on: January 09, 2010, 09:45:57 pm »
0
ahh eyah shit i was thinking of sinx since it would be correct for that one :P. Yeah you are correct they're wrong.
Thanks kamilz
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #667 on: January 09, 2010, 10:11:20 pm »
0


I've tried rationalising the numerator and denominator... none works, can't use L'hopital's theorem... what to do?
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

brightsky

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3136
  • Respect: +200
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #668 on: January 09, 2010, 10:22:36 pm »
0
You can use L'Hospital's rule. I pretty sure.



Let and .

Using L'Hospital's rule,





Substitute ,

« Last Edit: January 09, 2010, 10:32:30 pm by brightsky »
2020 - 2021: Master of Public Health, The University of Sydney
2017 - 2020: Doctor of Medicine, The University of Melbourne
2014 - 2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine, The University of Melbourne
2013 ATAR: 99.95

Currently selling copies of the VCE Chinese Exam Revision Book and UMEP Maths Exam Revision Book, and accepting students for Maths Methods and Specialist Maths Tutoring in 2020!

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #669 on: January 09, 2010, 10:24:53 pm »
0
You can use L'Hospital's rule. I pretty sure.
Yeah I know you can use it, but I specifically avoid it whenever I can because it's not fun and simply ruins the question.

I'm after a more elegant solution.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

brightsky

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3136
  • Respect: +200
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #670 on: January 09, 2010, 10:31:53 pm »
0
Oh ok, my bad..hmmm...
2020 - 2021: Master of Public Health, The University of Sydney
2017 - 2020: Doctor of Medicine, The University of Melbourne
2014 - 2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine, The University of Melbourne
2013 ATAR: 99.95

Currently selling copies of the VCE Chinese Exam Revision Book and UMEP Maths Exam Revision Book, and accepting students for Maths Methods and Specialist Maths Tutoring in 2020!

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #671 on: January 09, 2010, 11:56:20 pm »
0
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #672 on: January 09, 2010, 11:59:30 pm »
0
Ironically, binomial theorem is more sophisticated/advanced/harder to prove than L'hopital's rule.
Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #673 on: January 10, 2010, 12:00:23 am »
0
fuck l'hopital's rule, that cheap shit
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #674 on: January 10, 2010, 12:00:50 am »
0
LOL
I see calculus isn't liked very much around here :P