does that mean people who have applied for other categories apart from 5 and 6 have been disadvantaged? since the instruction of application has not prioritized those categories. what about people who applied for non-english speaking backgrounds but also fall within category 5&6 but was not informed to mention them to Vtac?
why 5&6? because those students tend to perform better than ESL students?
I answered this question before when Kendraa asked.
I think they choose these because it coevrs a SMALLER number of students than the category u mentioned.
Remember, A prestigious Uni like Melbourne doesn't want to be SWAMPED by people from "under represented schools".....and when u add ur category "non eng speaking background" it doubles this pool of people.
I am not saying these people are "dumb" or "worse", but Melbourne IMO decisively selected these 2 categories because of covers an ACCEPTABLE number of people....i.e. not too much.
Universities have come under INCREASING PRESSURE by the Government, media and public to offer more support for disadvantaged people, who are still intelligent/hard workers. This method is one way they hope to do thiss.
Dont worry, you still are CONSIDERED FOR SEAS, and this cna boost ur ENETR a little as well, so tis like the same effect as those who fall under Cat. 5/6, who have the requirement ENETR LOWERED.