There's no such thing as a free lunch means that someone foots the bill in the end.
It can be free for individuals within the system, but the cost is spread somewhere. We are bearing the costs for this.
Learn what a saying means before you use it.
Sorry Collin... but I still think Daniel's point stands.
So does Doboman's.
I asked for permission from Prav, so his point about "integrity" is moot.
I wanted to defend his position. I did the same thing once for dcc's moderatorship. The first thing mentioned to Prav was Merspi, then other things. I don't doubt that the other things were important (activity), but it was just a misjudgment to attribute any of it to Merspi.
If the original part of my post wasn't deleted, you would see that was a light stab at enwiabe for what he did, as well as discouraging me from other potentially good opportunities in the past (i.e.: David Shen). His backlash made it seem far more serious than it should have. I am sick of him taking everything behind the scenes, that is the only reason why I made a point of his edit this time - and not any other time (look for edits on my posts by enwiabe, if you want to see).
I apologize, but I happen to find this post quite funny, you are a fag.
I can understand reasons behind Prav's demotion: activity and quality of post are very important to moderatorship. As I see it, Merspi is a student community that has a meeting point online. Then the relationship between VN and Merspi is what a normal person would consider as "competition", and according to the Code of Conduct, only a technicality ("posts" vs "signature") is preventing Merspi links from being banned in signatures. I can only imagine the punitive actions would be more severe in the case of a VN staff advertising a competitor. You may be able to show Merspi is not a competitor of VN through some reasoning, but life doesn't get caught on technicalities.
9) Any posts directly advertising a competitive link, I.E. "Go here! BETTER FORUM!!!!!11" will be deleted immediately and the poster will be issued a warning.
(a) Any repeat offences will be rewarded with another deletion and more warnings.
(i) On the third or fourth offence, the offender will be banned for 1 day.
(ii) On the next offence, the offender will be banned for up to 7 days
(iii) Any repeat offences, the case will be referred to the administrator for possible permanent banning.
But of course, because Merspi is the first thing that was mentioned to Prav, that
has to be the predominant reason. You may also argue you never stated it was the predominant reason, but that's the only reason you quoted in your early posts. Again, life doesn't get caught on technicalities.
Though technically, because the first thing I said is "you are a fag", it happens to be the predominant reason I have in disagreeing, hence this post is invalid.