Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

February 24, 2026, 08:09:22 am

Author Topic: Variations in Obtaining gL-1  (Read 1090 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

vexx

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3965
  • Respect: +66
Variations in Obtaining gL-1
« on: February 27, 2010, 01:41:53 am »
0
Hi.

I was doing Q34 in the heinemenn which its last question is
"What is the concentration of sodium hypochlorite(NaOCl) in g L–1?"

Previously i had just gotten the mol of NaOCl at 0.01276mol (in 20ml), and then the amount in grams (mol x ~75 = 0.9502g)

And to get the amount in gram per litre, i found the concentation of NaOCl (0.01276/0.020=0.638 M) and then timed the concentration by the molar mass ~75 to get 47.53gL-1.

However, the answers say to use the amount in grams 0.9502g and do (x1000/25) to get 38.02gL-1.

Isn't the way i did it also correct, i've only been doing it my way usually and it's worked, why is this new way different and when will i be expected to do it this way?

Thanks,

Vexx.
2010 VCE: psychology | english language | methods cas | further | chemistry | physical ed | uni chemistry || ATAR: 97.40 ||

2011: BSc @ UoM

Y1: biology of cells&organisms | music psychology | biological psychology | secret life of language | creative writing
    || genetics&the evolution of life | biochemistry&molecular biology | techniques of molecular science -.- | mind,brain&behaviour 2

20XX: MEDICINE

physics

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2397
  • Its anna :D
  • Respect: +65
Re: Variations in Obtaining gL-1
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2010, 01:57:54 pm »
0
In my Heinemann it said tojust multiply the conecntration by the molar mass of the substance.,... (i think u said that already)

...the other way seems jibby...i wouldn't trust it XD
HELP ME GRADUATE!
If you know anyone pregnant let me know :)

My youtube channel:
http://www.youtube.com/Fairytailslilangel

Potter

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 148
  • Respect: +1
Re: Variations in Obtaining gL-1
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2010, 03:49:07 pm »
0
I think they made a mistake, it should be mass x 1000/20. Using 25 doesn't make sense at all..
2009-  IT: Applications [40]

2010- English | Specialist | Methods | Chem | MUEP Chem |

2011- ...Lets see where this road will take me.

vexx

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3965
  • Respect: +66
Re: Variations in Obtaining gL-1
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2010, 06:29:02 pm »
0
I think they made a mistake, it should be mass x 1000/20. Using 25 doesn't make sense at all..

Ah okay, that would make sense then.
I'll just ignore the question

Thanks peoples:)
2010 VCE: psychology | english language | methods cas | further | chemistry | physical ed | uni chemistry || ATAR: 97.40 ||

2011: BSc @ UoM

Y1: biology of cells&organisms | music psychology | biological psychology | secret life of language | creative writing
    || genetics&the evolution of life | biochemistry&molecular biology | techniques of molecular science -.- | mind,brain&behaviour 2

20XX: MEDICINE

simonhu81292

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 553
  • Respect: +8
Re: Variations in Obtaining gL-1
« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2010, 06:55:57 pm »
0
I think they made a mistake, it should be mass x 1000/20. Using 25 doesn't make sense at all..

Ah okay, that would make sense then.
I'll just ignore the question

Thanks peoples:)
hey vexx...just wanted to say that ... using either way still works..
as potter stated..it is the 25ml and the 20ml error...
if you play with the formulas... your concentration times molar mass will give you your grams per litre
 :smitten:

2009: -.- bio 3/4
2010: -.- Physics . Spesh . Methods CAS . Chinese SL Advanced . Chemistry . English Language
_____________________________________________________

2011-B.Com@UoM
2014 - Hons in Finance@UoM
2015 - Working in Funds Management (Equities)

vexx

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3965
  • Respect: +66
Re: Variations in Obtaining gL-1
« Reply #5 on: February 28, 2010, 12:50:30 pm »
0
I think they made a mistake, it should be mass x 1000/20. Using 25 doesn't make sense at all..

Ah okay, that would make sense then.
I'll just ignore the question

Thanks peoples:)
hey vexx...just wanted to say that ... using either way still works..
as potter stated..it is the 25ml and the 20ml error...
if you play with the formulas... your concentration times molar mass will give you your grams per litre
 :smitten:



yeah i tried both and it worked:) thanks.
2010 VCE: psychology | english language | methods cas | further | chemistry | physical ed | uni chemistry || ATAR: 97.40 ||

2011: BSc @ UoM

Y1: biology of cells&organisms | music psychology | biological psychology | secret life of language | creative writing
    || genetics&the evolution of life | biochemistry&molecular biology | techniques of molecular science -.- | mind,brain&behaviour 2

20XX: MEDICINE