Subject a year early: do u get the scaling from that year or when your in yr 12?

[emb_23]

?

[minilunchbox]

Scaling from that year.

[emb_23]

gay

[Gloamglozer]

Scaling from that year.

That.  Although /0 thinks his Methods score was scaled according to the 2009 cohort and not with the 2008 cohort when he did Methods.

[TrueTears]

Scaling from that year.

That.  Although /0 thinks his Methods score was scaled according to the 2009 cohort and not with the 2008 cohort when he did Methods.

yeah its weird because i got the same score as /0 but our scaling was different, he actually got a tiny bit higher scaling than me by like 0.1 or something

[lolbox]

Scaling from that year.

That.  Although /0 thinks his Methods score was scaled according to the 2009 cohort and not with the 2008 cohort when he did Methods.

yeah its weird because i got the same score as /0 but our scaling was different, he actually got a tiny bit higher scaling than me by like 0.1 or something

How is that weird? That seems to make sense cause /0 did methods in 08, thus different scaling (which is why he got 0.1 higher). Whereas you did it in 09

[/0]

I don't really remember what happened, I probably said something about it somewhere on the forum though...

[TrueTears]

Scaling from that year.

That.  Although /0 thinks his Methods score was scaled according to the 2009 cohort and not with the 2008 cohort when he did Methods.

yeah its weird because i got the same score as /0 but our scaling was different, he actually got a tiny bit higher scaling than me by like 0.1 or something

How is that weird? That seems to make sense cause /0 did methods in 08, thus different scaling (which is why he got 0.1 higher). Whereas you did it in 09

but he says he was scaled according to 09 data... how is it not weird?

besides my chinese score was scaled according to 09 data but i did it in 08

[Gloamglozer]

Scaling from that year.

That.  Although /0 thinks his Methods score was scaled according to the 2009 cohort and not with the 2008 cohort when he did Methods.

yeah its weird because i got the same score as /0 but our scaling was different, he actually got a tiny bit higher scaling than me by like 0.1 or something

How is that weird? That seems to make sense cause /0 did methods in 08, thus different scaling (which is why he got 0.1 higher). Whereas you did it in 09

but he says he was scaled according to 09 data... how is it not weird?

besides my chinese score was scaled according to 09 data but i did it in 08

Yeah, my Chinese score was a tad off than what it said in the 2008 Scaling Report.  But it was only 0.01, not that it would really change my ENTER by a lot.    lol

[akira88]

I swear it should be in the year you did the subject, it only makes sense as you "competed" with the people in that year. I have this annoying girl going to me, "WRONG I THOUGHT YOU WERE SMART THEY SCALE YOU AT THE END WHEN YOU GET YOUR ENTER." :| Ok... lol.

Hmm but strange in TT's case.