Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 19, 2025, 05:59:02 pm

Author Topic: Families of functions question  (Read 5102 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Families of functions question
« Reply #15 on: February 27, 2008, 09:48:55 pm »
0
mmm on a closer inspection, toothpick's method was the easiest, and probably will become my preference now

but partial fractions is not part of the methods course, and is only used in spec. for differentiation (or antidifferentiation? i forget), and for someone doing methods, i'm guessing that simple algebra (with a few more steps) and equality of polynomials should suffice :P

but, PARTIAL FRACTIONS FTW!
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

dcc

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1198
  • Respect: +55
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Families of functions question
« Reply #16 on: February 27, 2008, 10:20:06 pm »
0










Now obviously we have to get rid of the from the numerator, so let us figure out what 2x + 1 equals:







adding 1 to find 2x + 1, we get

So we can rewrite our integral:



Which when expanded out is:



Anti differentiating this, we get:



Which when getting rid of the 1/5's, becomes:



Substituing in for u, we get:





Now, differentiating F(x), we will arrive back at f(x):



When expanded, this becomes:





Therefore:
« Last Edit: February 27, 2008, 10:26:56 pm by dcc »

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Families of functions question
« Reply #17 on: February 27, 2008, 10:23:46 pm »
0
OMG I LOVE CALCULUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

that was so smart xD
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

AppleXY

  • Life cannot be Delta Hedged.
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2619
  • Even when the bears bite, confidence never dies.
  • Respect: +16
Re: Families of functions question
« Reply #18 on: February 27, 2008, 10:34:31 pm »
0
OMG I LOVE CALCULUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

that was so smart xD

Amen.

2009 - BBus (Econometrics/Economics&Fin) @ Monash


For Email: click here

Need a question answered? Merspi it!

[quote="Benjamin F

Glockmeister

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1660
  • RIP Sweet Nothings.
  • Respect: +8
Re: Families of functions question
« Reply #19 on: February 27, 2008, 10:35:57 pm »
0
2nd Amen here.

Still prefer long division though.
"this post is more confusing than actual chemistry.... =S" - Mao

[22:07] <robbo> i luv u Glockmeister

<Glockmeister> like the people who like do well academically
<Glockmeister> tend to deny they actually do well
<%Neobeo> sounds like Ahmad0
<@Ahmad0> no
<@Ahmad0> sounds like Neobeo

2007: Mathematical Methods 37; Psychology 38
2008: English 33; Specialist Maths 32 ; Chemistry 38; IT: Applications 42
2009: Bachelor of Behavioural Neuroscience, Monash University.

Collin Li

  • VCE Tutor
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4957
  • Respect: +17
Re: Families of functions question
« Reply #20 on: February 27, 2008, 10:40:49 pm »
0
The best way is just to match the denominator:





Always use this trick when you're dividing a linear function by another one. It's so easy! Here's a simple example:



The hassle of long division is avoided!
« Last Edit: February 27, 2008, 10:44:17 pm by coblin »

humph

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1437
  • Respect: +16
Re: Families of functions question
« Reply #21 on: February 28, 2008, 12:13:53 am »
0
precisely! only i generally do most of that working out in my head  ;D
VCE 2006
PhB (Hons) (Sc), ANU, 2007-2010
MPhil, ANU, 2011-2012
PhD, Princeton, 2012-2017
Research Associate, University College London, 2017-2020
Assistant Professor, University of Virginia, 2020-

Feel free to ask me about (advanced) mathematics.

Neobeo

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 188
  • 反逆 の Neobeo
  • Respect: +3
Re: Families of functions question
« Reply #22 on: February 28, 2008, 12:46:23 am »
0
The main problem with every method discussed here is that if you make one wrong step, you get everything wrong. In all the above solutions, a, b and c are very closely dependent on each other. Therefore a wrong answer in a will result in a wrong answer for b and c. This is of course very bad for marks. So let's see how we can solve each variable one at a time.



By equating with we can obtain the solution, but again this will be prone to "one mistake leads to everything wrong" kind of situation as mentioned.

We can find c by itself, using limits.






We can also find b by itself, also using limits.








Finally we now we find a. This should be less taxing since it uses no limits at all. Only derivatives.





Keeping in mind that both sides are equal, we differentiate them two more times






As you can see, the solutions for each variable are independent from each other. Now you do not have to worry about making a mistake from the first step. Even if one of them is wrong, the other two can still be right!

In conclusion:
Mathematics Coach: Tuition and Enrichment // Email/MSN:

If you remember the flying birds, they died D=

xce

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 5
  • Respect: 0
Re: Families of functions question
« Reply #23 on: February 28, 2008, 07:02:41 am »
0
Thanks so much for all your help, everyone! I'll read and digest it all tonight :P Out of curiosity, how did you know about synthetic long division? We have only covered polynomial long division in class?

AppleXY

  • Life cannot be Delta Hedged.
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2619
  • Even when the bears bite, confidence never dies.
  • Respect: +16
Re: Families of functions question
« Reply #24 on: February 28, 2008, 07:44:31 am »
0

2009 - BBus (Econometrics/Economics&Fin) @ Monash


For Email: click here

Need a question answered? Merspi it!

[quote="Benjamin F

xce

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 5
  • Respect: 0
Re: Families of functions question
« Reply #25 on: February 28, 2008, 07:46:39 pm »
0
Heh, I read up when I saw dcc's post. So you just read mathematics-related Wikipedia pages? You haven't been taught this in class? Is it part of the course?

Glockmeister

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1660
  • RIP Sweet Nothings.
  • Respect: +8
Re: Families of functions question
« Reply #26 on: February 28, 2008, 07:48:29 pm »
0
I don't think this is specifically in the curriculum, but I think the MHS people do get taught this ('cause my brother knows it)
"this post is more confusing than actual chemistry.... =S" - Mao

[22:07] <robbo> i luv u Glockmeister

<Glockmeister> like the people who like do well academically
<Glockmeister> tend to deny they actually do well
<%Neobeo> sounds like Ahmad0
<@Ahmad0> no
<@Ahmad0> sounds like Neobeo

2007: Mathematical Methods 37; Psychology 38
2008: English 33; Specialist Maths 32 ; Chemistry 38; IT: Applications 42
2009: Bachelor of Behavioural Neuroscience, Monash University.

Collin Li

  • VCE Tutor
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4957
  • Respect: +17
Re: Families of functions question
« Reply #27 on: February 28, 2008, 07:57:43 pm »
0
Synthetic division is nothing more than just doing the long division in your head. It's simple enough: just write it down term by term, storing the next number in your head (or sometimes the next two).

Ahmad

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1296
  • *dreamy sigh*
  • Respect: +15
Re: Families of functions question
« Reply #28 on: February 28, 2008, 09:06:10 pm »
0
Convoluted solution (upon request) with absolutely no benefit, using generating functions:

LHS:








RHS:






Mandark: Please, oh please, set me up on a date with that golden-haired angel who graces our undeserving school with her infinite beauty!

The collage of ideas. The music of reason. The poetry of thought. The canvas of logic.


AppleXY

  • Life cannot be Delta Hedged.
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2619
  • Even when the bears bite, confidence never dies.
  • Respect: +16
Re: Families of functions question
« Reply #29 on: March 01, 2008, 01:38:17 pm »
0
Wow. Well there you go, generating functions for Partial fractions. Amazing. But again, SUPER impractical :P

2009 - BBus (Econometrics/Economics&Fin) @ Monash


For Email: click here

Need a question answered? Merspi it!

[quote="Benjamin F