Has anyone transferred from Business(Accounting) Caulfield to Accounting in Clay

[Fyrefly]

Off-topic: OMG PRAV YOU'RE ALIVE!!!!

Go to Deakin, trust me. It's a load better. Caulfield is epically boring. No really, don't go to Caulfield.

Really? the caulfield campus is pretty big isn't it? I assumed it would be a pretty good campus.

The person above seems to think monash is good also.
I don't know what to do..... I'll be seeing the careers person at my school pretty soon, i'll see what she says.

Prav goes to Monash Caulfield... his opinion on Monash Caulfield is probably one of the most informed, since it isn't second-hand.

[schmalex]

Go to Deakin, trust me. It's a load better. Caulfield is epically boring. No really, don't go to Caulfield.

Really? the caulfield campus is pretty big isn't it? I assumed it would be a pretty good campus.

The person above seems to think monash is good also.
I don't know what to do..... I'll be seeing the careers person at my school pretty soon, i'll see what she says.

The thing is, Caulfield is technically Monash, but it's completely different subjects and probably different textbooks, lecturers etc. to Clayton. They probably put all of their effort and energy into Clayton, meaning Business at Caulfield isn't great.

[Fyrefly]

Go to Deakin, trust me. It's a load better. Caulfield is epically boring. No really, don't go to Caulfield.

Really? the caulfield campus is pretty big isn't it? I assumed it would be a pretty good campus.

The person above seems to think monash is good also.
I don't know what to do..... I'll be seeing the careers person at my school pretty soon, i'll see what she says.

The thing is, Caulfield is technically Monash, but it's completely different subjects and probably different textbooks, lecturers etc. to Clayton. They probably put all of their effort and energy into Clayton, meaning Business at Caulfield isn't great.

Some of the units are identical actually... like... AFC1000 and AFF1000 used the exact same textbook and sat the exact same exam.

[schmalex]

Go to Deakin, trust me. It's a load better. Caulfield is epically boring. No really, don't go to Caulfield.

Really? the caulfield campus is pretty big isn't it? I assumed it would be a pretty good campus.

The person above seems to think monash is good also.
I don't know what to do..... I'll be seeing the careers person at my school pretty soon, i'll see what she says.

The thing is, Caulfield is technically Monash, but it's completely different subjects and probably different textbooks, lecturers etc. to Clayton. They probably put all of their effort and energy into Clayton, meaning Business at Caulfield isn't great.

Some of the units are identical actually... like... AFC1000 and AFF1000 used the exact same textbook and sat the exact same exam.

Okay, I was looking up economics units and they seemed quite different between Caulfield, Clayton and Berwick. But now that I think about it, economics is probably the main reason for Clayton having the methods requirement, so subjects that don't need methods could possibly be the same. Don't mind me:P

[Kairubin]

ahh prav is being picky because he failed accounting

[*ryan777*]

Go to Deakin, trust me. It's a load better. Caulfield is epically boring. No really, don't go to Caulfield.

Really? the caulfield campus is pretty big isn't it? I assumed it would be a pretty good campus.

The person above seems to think monash is good also.
I don't know what to do..... I'll be seeing the careers person at my school pretty soon, i'll see what she says.

The thing is, Caulfield is technically Monash, but it's completely different subjects and probably different textbooks, lecturers etc. to Clayton. They probably put all of their effort and energy into Clayton, meaning Business at Caulfield isn't great.

Some of the units are identical actually... like... AFC1000 and AFF1000 used the exact same textbook and sat the exact same exam.

Okay, I was looking up economics units and they seemed quite different between Caulfield, Clayton and Berwick. But now that I think about it, economics is probably the main reason for Clayton having the methods requirement, so subjects that don't need methods could possibly be the same. Don't mind me:P

i think the methods requirement is more for thinking skills in earlier years
however 1st year economics at caulfield is more maths based that at clayton

i dont think afc1000 and aff1000 have the same exam tho, just same textbook

[laynie]

Go to Deakin, trust me. It's a load better. Caulfield is epically boring. No really, don't go to Caulfield.

Really? the caulfield campus is pretty big isn't it? I assumed it would be a pretty good campus.

The person above seems to think monash is good also.
I don't know what to do..... I'll be seeing the careers person at my school pretty soon, i'll see what she says.

The thing is, Caulfield is technically Monash, but it's completely different subjects and probably different textbooks, lecturers etc. to Clayton. They probably put all of their effort and energy into Clayton, meaning Business at Caulfield isn't great.

Some of the units are identical actually... like... AFC1000 and AFF1000 used the exact same textbook and sat the exact same exam.

Okay, I was looking up economics units and they seemed quite different between Caulfield, Clayton and Berwick. But now that I think about it, economics is probably the main reason for Clayton having the methods requirement, so subjects that don't need methods could possibly be the same. Don't mind me:P

i think the methods requirement is more for thinking skills in earlier years
however 1st year economics at caulfield is more maths based that at clayton

i dont think afc1000 and aff1000 have the same exam tho, just same textbook

on the front of the exam did it have ticks for both Caulfield and Clayton this year?

[*ryan777*]

i dont think so, but then again i didnt pay much attention

[IntoTheNewWorld]

I don'ttt think sooooo

but I can't remember =S