Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 12:38:16 pm

Author Topic: Weird combustion  (Read 1383 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Weird combustion
« on: June 05, 2010, 10:40:52 pm »
0
A mixture of hexane and oxygen was placed in an evacuated vessel at 300°C. The pressure
inside the vessel was 80 kPa. After ignition by a spark, the mixture reacted completely to
form CO2, CO and water vapour. The contents of the container were returned to 300°C and
the pressure was found to be 130 kPa.
Which of the following equations best describes the reaction that took place?
A. C6H14(g) + 8O2(g) → 3CO(g) + 3CO2(g) + 7H2O(g).
B. C6H14(g) + 7O2(g) → 5CO(g) + CO2(g) + 7H2O(g).
C. 2C6H14(g) + 15O2(g) → 8CO(g) + 4CO2(g) + 14H2O(g).
D. 2C6H14(g) + 17O2(g) → 4CO(g) + 8CO2(g) + 14H2O(g).

For this one I did it visually so like the only thing that changed was products being formed which means an increase in volume must lead to the increase in pressure so what im looking for as n is proportional to V BUT it is also proportional to pressure.

So B? I don't have answers *sigh*
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time

ghadz7

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 246
  • Respect: +1
Re: Weird combustion
« Reply #1 on: June 05, 2010, 10:46:36 pm »
0
yeah I got B too
[2009]
Methods [46]
[2010]
English; Chemistry; Physics; Further; Specialist; UMEP Maths
[2011]
Architecture

Stroodle

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 855
  • Respect: +4
Re: Weird combustion
« Reply #2 on: June 05, 2010, 10:48:04 pm »
0
Yeah, I remember this question. I just figured the same (that n is proportional to P) which gives you B, and that was the correct answer, if I remember correctly.

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Re: Weird combustion
« Reply #3 on: June 05, 2010, 10:49:36 pm »
0
this invovled way too much thinking.
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time

ghadz7

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 246
  • Respect: +1
Re: Weird combustion
« Reply #4 on: June 05, 2010, 10:51:33 pm »
0
LOL! I added the coefficients on the right (8) and coefficients on the left (13). Took me a three second :P
[2009]
Methods [46]
[2010]
English; Chemistry; Physics; Further; Specialist; UMEP Maths
[2011]
Architecture

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Re: Weird combustion
« Reply #5 on: June 05, 2010, 10:55:05 pm »
0
Yeah. Getting to that point where you realise that.
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time

stonecold

  • Victorian
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5335
  • Respect: +255
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Weird combustion
« Reply #6 on: June 05, 2010, 11:21:59 pm »
0
These are the workings.  I have no idea how this question works.

Q20 B According to pV = nRT, if the volume of the vessel is constant and the
temperature after reaction is allowed to return to the initial temperature, the
pressures before and after the reaction are proportional to the numbers of mole of
reactants and products respectively.
Since p(after reaction) / p(before reaction) = 130 / 80= 1.625

Hence n(products) / n(products) = 1.625.

Check each alternative
A. n(products) / n(products) = 13 / 9 = 1.444
B. n(products) / n(products) = 13 / 8 = 1.625
C. n(products) / n(products) = 26 / 17 = 1.529
D. n(products) / n(products) = 26 / 19 = 1.368
2011-13: BBiomed (Microbiology & Immunology Major) @ UniMelb


VCE 2009'10: English 46 | English Language 49 | Chemistry 50 | Biology 50 | Further Mathematics 48 | Mathematical Methods CAS 39
ATAR: 99.85

"Failure is not when one falls down but rather when one fails to get up" - unknown

stonecold

  • Victorian
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5335
  • Respect: +255
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Weird combustion
« Reply #7 on: June 05, 2010, 11:23:12 pm »
0
how do you know the volume is constant?
2011-13: BBiomed (Microbiology & Immunology Major) @ UniMelb


VCE 2009'10: English 46 | English Language 49 | Chemistry 50 | Biology 50 | Further Mathematics 48 | Mathematical Methods CAS 39
ATAR: 99.85

"Failure is not when one falls down but rather when one fails to get up" - unknown

kyzoo

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2040
  • Respect: +23
Re: Weird combustion
« Reply #8 on: June 05, 2010, 11:31:49 pm »
0
Because its all done in a container of fixed volume
2009
~ Methods (Non-CAS) [48 --> 49.4]

2010
~ Spesh [50 --> 51.6]
~ Physics [50 --> 50]
~ Chem [43 --> 46.5]
~ English [46 --> 46.2]
~ UMEP Maths [5.0]

2010 ATAR: 99.90
Aggregate 206.8

NOTE: PLEASE CONTACT ME ON EMAIL - [email protected] if you are looking for a swift reply.

stonecold

  • Victorian
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5335
  • Respect: +255
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Weird combustion
« Reply #9 on: June 05, 2010, 11:44:12 pm »
0
okay, thanks kyzoo.  i just reduce everything to basic cross multiplication haha.

8 mol (initial) / 80 kPa = x mol (final) / 130 kPa

x = 13 mol

you can try it out for all of them, it only gives the right answer for B :D
2011-13: BBiomed (Microbiology & Immunology Major) @ UniMelb


VCE 2009'10: English 46 | English Language 49 | Chemistry 50 | Biology 50 | Further Mathematics 48 | Mathematical Methods CAS 39
ATAR: 99.85

"Failure is not when one falls down but rather when one fails to get up" - unknown

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Re: Weird combustion
« Reply #10 on: June 05, 2010, 11:45:17 pm »
0
ROFL your simplifying to ratios is golden coldie.
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time

stonecold

  • Victorian
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5335
  • Respect: +255
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Weird combustion
« Reply #11 on: June 05, 2010, 11:49:05 pm »
0
The day ratios don't work for me, I'm epically screwed. :(

Interestingly, the last two VCAA exams have had a whole question where all you had to do was set up a simple cross multiplication/ratios and solve for the unknown.  I love it!

Please have this this year...

And I now love AAS/UV-Vis calculations... all it is is ratios :D
« Last Edit: June 05, 2010, 11:57:05 pm by stonecold »
2011-13: BBiomed (Microbiology & Immunology Major) @ UniMelb


VCE 2009'10: English 46 | English Language 49 | Chemistry 50 | Biology 50 | Further Mathematics 48 | Mathematical Methods CAS 39
ATAR: 99.85

"Failure is not when one falls down but rather when one fails to get up" - unknown

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Re: Weird combustion
« Reply #12 on: June 05, 2010, 11:50:08 pm »
0
Then there will be the day where it gives you a non - linear one. Then the whole state is screwed.
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time

stonecold

  • Victorian
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5335
  • Respect: +255
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Weird combustion
« Reply #13 on: June 05, 2010, 11:52:16 pm »
0
Yeah.  For absorbance you can have non-linear, but with stuff like taking a solution from one place and then diluting it, it is all x-multiplication :)
2011-13: BBiomed (Microbiology & Immunology Major) @ UniMelb


VCE 2009'10: English 46 | English Language 49 | Chemistry 50 | Biology 50 | Further Mathematics 48 | Mathematical Methods CAS 39
ATAR: 99.85

"Failure is not when one falls down but rather when one fails to get up" - unknown

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Re: Weird combustion
« Reply #14 on: June 06, 2010, 12:09:46 am »
0
You....forget.... this is the state of victoria.......  ::)
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time