Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 20, 2025, 04:26:21 am

Author Topic: IR  (Read 1179 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Studyinghard

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1313
  • Respect: +4
IR
« on: June 08, 2010, 11:49:11 pm »
0
sweet. crosses fingers for chemical shift definition XD
« Last Edit: June 09, 2010, 01:05:46 am by TrueTears »
"Your life is like a river, no matter what you just got to keep on going"

Studyinghard

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1313
  • Respect: +4
Re: Relating chemical shifts
« Reply #1 on: June 08, 2010, 11:53:08 pm »
0
Now that we're on the topic. how does the IR wavenumber relate to its actual process. the more bonds vibrating the higher the wavenumber?
"Your life is like a river, no matter what you just got to keep on going"

olly_s15

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 477
  • Respect: +4
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Relating chemical shifts
« Reply #2 on: June 08, 2010, 11:55:35 pm »
0
Now that we're on the topic. how does the IR wavenumber relate to its actual process. the more bonds vibrating the higher the wavenumber?

the wavenumber is the reciprocal of the wavelength required for vibration of the bond
Science at UoM (Pharmacology/Neuroscience)
VCE 2010

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Re: Relating chemical shifts
« Reply #3 on: June 08, 2010, 11:55:49 pm »
0
higher wavenumber -> lower wavelength -> higher frequency -> more energy to vibrate bonds.


Bonds are vibrating all the time. Heavier ones will vibrate less (coz their big and fat) and thus have smaller wave numbers. The absorbance corresponds to EXACTLY the right frequency to which the vibrating, scissoring is taking place.

Also stronger bond ie double or triple MORE energy required so HIGHER wavelength.
« Last Edit: June 08, 2010, 11:59:22 pm by Martoman »
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time

Studyinghard

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1313
  • Respect: +4
Re: Relating chemical shifts
« Reply #4 on: June 08, 2010, 11:59:10 pm »
0
Oh so like for the highest wavenumber which is 3350–3500 the least energy needed to vibrate bonds because they are as you say not as big and fat?
"Your life is like a river, no matter what you just got to keep on going"

olly_s15

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 477
  • Respect: +4
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Relating chemical shifts
« Reply #5 on: June 09, 2010, 12:00:35 am »
0
Oh so like for the highest wavenumber which is 3350–3500 the least energy needed to vibrate bonds because they are as you say not as big and fat?

this is a simplification but yeah sorta

think of it like this - wavenumber is reciprocal of wavelength. so if the wavenumber is 33500-3500 (large) then it's reciprocal which is wavelength is small (hence small energy to vibrate bond)
Science at UoM (Pharmacology/Neuroscience)
VCE 2010

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Re: Relating chemical shifts
« Reply #6 on: June 09, 2010, 12:00:45 am »
0
nonononononono

Big fat -> LESS energy.

Higer wavenumber -> MORE energy.

These guys are fit and limber. They have more energy than fat slobs.
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time

olly_s15

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 477
  • Respect: +4
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Relating chemical shifts
« Reply #7 on: June 09, 2010, 12:01:41 am »
0
nonononononono

Big fat -> LESS energy.

Higer wavenumber -> MORE energy.

These guys are fit and limber. They have more energy than fat slobs.

i think we're contradicting each other
Science at UoM (Pharmacology/Neuroscience)
VCE 2010

Toothpaste

  • pseudospastic
  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1648
  • Member #10
  • Respect: +26
Re: Relating chemical shifts
« Reply #8 on: June 09, 2010, 12:01:53 am »
0
Yep here's a summary
  • A stronger bond will vibrate at higher frequencies (wavenumber)
  • Greater atom mass = lower frequency
  • Also usually a "stretch" > "bend" and single bond > triple bond > double bond

You also need a dipole to see the absorption in the infared spectrum. I.e. can't have but you can have .
« Last Edit: June 09, 2010, 12:20:16 am by Toothpaste »

Studyinghard

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1313
  • Respect: +4
Re: Relating chemical shifts
« Reply #9 on: June 09, 2010, 12:02:58 am »
0
nonononononono

Big fat -> LESS energy.

Higer wavenumber -> MORE energy.

These guys are fit and limber. They have more energy than fat slobs.

i think we're contradicting each other
exactly, you'z just contradicted each other now im all :S!.

"Your life is like a river, no matter what you just got to keep on going"

olly_s15

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 477
  • Respect: +4
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Relating chemical shifts
« Reply #10 on: June 09, 2010, 12:03:56 am »
0
nonononononono

Big fat -> LESS energy.

Higer wavenumber -> MORE energy.

These guys are fit and limber. They have more energy than fat slobs.

i think we're contradicting each other
exactly, you'z just contradicted each other now im all :S!.



i think the flaw in my explanation is that i said small wavelength = small energy but that isn't true isssss it
Science at UoM (Pharmacology/Neuroscience)
VCE 2010

Studyinghard

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1313
  • Respect: +4
Re: Relating chemical shifts
« Reply #11 on: June 09, 2010, 12:07:29 am »
0
Okay I think its like this.

The stronger the bond in the molecule ( so lets take covalent bonding ) the bigger the wavenumber needed to vibrate the bonds. yes?
"Your life is like a river, no matter what you just got to keep on going"

olly_s15

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 477
  • Respect: +4
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Relating chemical shifts
« Reply #12 on: June 09, 2010, 12:09:08 am »
0
Okay I think its like this.

The stronger the bond in the molecule ( so lets take covalent bonding ) the bigger the wavenumber needed to vibrate the bonds. yes?

yes.

strong bond = high energy = high frequency = low wavelength = high wavenumber
Science at UoM (Pharmacology/Neuroscience)
VCE 2010

Studyinghard

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1313
  • Respect: +4
Re: Relating chemical shifts
« Reply #13 on: June 09, 2010, 12:09:58 am »
0
BUT how come primary amines are highest wavenumber. they have hydrogen bonding :S
"Your life is like a river, no matter what you just got to keep on going"

olly_s15

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 477
  • Respect: +4
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Relating chemical shifts
« Reply #14 on: June 09, 2010, 12:12:44 am »
0
well then that is a strong bond hence high wavenumber as indicated by my previous post
Science at UoM (Pharmacology/Neuroscience)
VCE 2010