VCE Chemistry 2010 Unit 3 Exam Suggested Solutions

[hyperblade01]

LOL

MC 13 - First thing that popped into my mind was electrophilic and nucleophilic attack So tempted to write out the mechanisms as well

[stonecold]

Damn, just reread the question, it asked for the value of the stoichiometric ratio
Doesnt value mean just one number?

how can you have a value of the ratio? that doesnt even make sense ! or does it? SIGH

I know.  Absolute shit question.  As long as you recognised it was 3:1, why should you not be eligible for the mark.  You interpreted everything correct.

[matt123]

i got like 80-95% on the 20 + prac exams i did
then i stuffed up the EASIEST exam today
so angry

[appianway]

Don't worry, I was getting about 100% on most of my trials, but alas, on the one that actually counted... I think most people here did a lot worse than expected.

[taiga]

Don't worry, I was getting about 100% on most of my trials, but alas, on the one that actually counted... I think most people here did a lot worse than expected.

True. I didn't make any major mistakes, but I think i lost one mark for about 3 or 4 seperate questions

[matt123]

made a huge major mistake
misread the question and accidently said there is 137 double bonds
lmfao fml

[Studyinghard]

Damn, just reread the question, it asked for the value of the stoichiometric ratio
Doesnt value mean just one number?

how can you have a value of the ratio? that doesnt even make sense ! or does it? SIGH

I know.  Absolute shit question.  As long as you recognised it was 3:1, why should you not be eligible for the mark.  You interpreted everything correct.

if they dont give me a mark for that ima personally go to the examiners house and ..................SCREAM AT HIM.

[Akirus]

Damn, just reread the question, it asked for the value of the stoichiometric ratio
Doesnt value mean just one number?

how can you have a value of the ratio? that doesnt even make sense ! or does it? SIGH

I know.  Absolute shit question.  As long as you recognised it was 3:1, why should you not be eligible for the mark.  You interpreted everything correct.

I doubt they'll penalize that as long as you got the ratio correct, I don't see why they would be that anal about it.

[stonecold]

Maybe A+ won't be so high after all appian.  

Next exam will be the one that counts anyway...

[kenhung123]

made a huge major mistake
misread the question and accidently said there is 137 double bonds
lmfao fml

hehe...sorry thats a bit funny

[appianway]

Yeah, I think it was a tricky exam. Not difficult conceptually. But tricky. And I think a lot of people would've dropped quite a few marks. I anticipate a cut off of around 65... which is on par with 08.

[darkphoenix]

made a huge major mistake
misread the question and accidently said there is 137 double bonds
lmfao fml

LMAO i got 5, but i worked it out to be 6, too bad it was just my own random working out, so ill prob get 0 for that FML

[matt123]

hahah yeah i screwd that exam up so bad
65%
see ya later any chance at 97 enter .... means i got a C at best a B+ . .meas ill end up with a study score of 30-35
means .... im farked

[Studyinghard]

made a huge major mistake
misread the question and accidently said there is 137 double bonds
lmfao fml

hehe...sorry thats a bit funny

lol i though that too. just didnt wanna say anything. 137 double bonds would have had to strike that somethign was wrong

[stonecold]

imagine if the next question was:

Draw the acid.  rofl, that would have been torture...