Heinemann or nature of biology

[lisafaustina]

I use heinemann and I was wondering if all the contents in chapter 11 is all you have to know?
Also do you recommend nature of bio?

[slothpomba]

Heinemann has some mistakes which have been pointed out on this forum.

Haven't really used it much but i reckon Nature of Bio is some pretty good, sometimes it has some extra unnecessary information but except for one little topic in last years exam, its not missing any information.

There's probably an ebook download of it floating around these forums if you look hard enough.

[lexitu]

Can you tell me what that poorly-covered area was kingpomba so I know what I need to cover from now?

I think both are good, Heinemann is more to the point but NOB is also okay. But NOB has a lot of irrelevant things too.

[Russ]

One of my students uses NoB (I think) and it has a lot of information that's on top of the VCE course, so be ready to filter that out if you use it.

[lexitu]

Yeah it sure does, and it's a pain in the arse to filter because they include useful information within useless information. It's like a bionovel.

[happyhappyland]

Its best to ask your teacher how much you need to know and to use checkpoints to reaffirm those claims

[slothpomba]

It was on fractioning, which is in biozone work book. That was unit 3 though, doesn't matter anymore.