Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 20, 2025, 08:30:48 am

Author Topic: Differentiation...  (Read 2653 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

squance

  • Guest
Differentiation...
« on: April 08, 2008, 09:52:30 pm »
0
Can someone please help me out with some differentiation???

I keep getting the wrong answers....

Find the derivative of the following:

y(x) = x/(x^2+1)^1/2

I got (x^2+1) - 2x/(x^2+1)^3/2 as the answer to the first one... but the answer is 1/(x^2+1)^3/2

h(x) = -3x/2(1-x^2)^1/4

Im screwed for the second one.,.....
the answer for the second one is 3/4(1-x^2)^-5/4(x^2-2)

I know how to do these but its messy but i keep getting them wrong.. we use quotient rule for both...I need a solution please.

ed_saifa

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 911
  • Respect: +5
Re: Differentiation...
« Reply #1 on: April 08, 2008, 09:57:19 pm »
0
Perhaps make it a negative power and then use the product rule?
[IMG]http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/2506/avatarcg3.png[/img]
(\ /)
(0.o)
(><)
/_|_\

"It's not a community effort"
"It's not allowed. Only death is a valid excuse"
"Probably for the first time time this year I was totally flabbergasted by some of the 'absolute junk' I had to correct .... I was going to use 'crap' but that was too kind a word"
"How can you expect to do well when
-you draw a lemon as having two half-cells connected with a salt bridge
-your lemons come with Cu2+ ions built in" - Dwyer
"Why'd you score so bad?!" - Zotos
"Your arguments are seri

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Differentiation...
« Reply #2 on: April 08, 2008, 10:01:32 pm »
0


using the quotient rule



multiplying by on top and bottom:






second question:







then using the quotient rule again:



multiplying by on top and bottom:









tada :D
« Last Edit: April 08, 2008, 10:16:08 pm by Mao »
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

squance

  • Guest
Re: Differentiation...
« Reply #3 on: April 10, 2008, 11:10:01 pm »
0
Thanks...:)

But now I have more difficult questions....Please help me!!!

For the following functions evalutate the first few derivatives f'(x), f''(x), F^(3) (x) and so on. Deduce the pattern and write down an expression for the nth derivative f^(n)x

a). f(x) = x^n (answer is n! = n x (n-1) x (n-2) x (n-3)...

b). f(x) = 1/3x^3 (answer is (-1)^n (n+2)!/(6x^(n+3)


Assuming g(x) is twice differentiable, that is, we can write down g'(x) and g''(x), write down expressions for f''(x) if:

a). f(x) = xg(x^2) (answer is 6xg'(x^2) + 4x^3g''(x^2)

b). f(x) = g(root x) (answre is rootx g'' (root x) - g'(root x)/(4x root x)

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Differentiation...
« Reply #4 on: April 10, 2008, 11:17:26 pm »
0
part 1:

a)








so the overall pattern is (kth derivative):



which simplifies to:



so why is your answer like that... =S ?

*argh* do the rest 2morrow :)
« Last Edit: April 11, 2008, 04:10:37 pm by Mao »
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Differentiation...
« Reply #5 on: April 11, 2008, 03:59:48 pm »
0
And here's the rest:

part 1:
b)








noticing the pattern here:






part 2:

Quote
Assuming g(x) is twice differentiable, that is, we can write down g'(x) and g''(x), write down expressions for f''(x) if:

a). f(x) = xg(x^2) (answer is 6xg'(x^2) + 4x^3g''(x^2)

b). f(x) = g(root x) (answre is rootx g'' (root x) - g'(root x)/(4x root x)

a)
using the product rule:





therefore



then using the product rule again:







b)





using chain rule (let ):





then, taking the out and using the product rule:











and why this is different to your solutions... i dont know
did i make a mistake somewhere?
« Last Edit: April 11, 2008, 04:29:59 pm by Mao »
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

squance

  • Guest
Re: Differentiation...
« Reply #6 on: April 11, 2008, 07:47:25 pm »
0


b)





using chain rule (let ):





then, taking the out and using the product rule:











and why this is different to your solutions... i dont know
did i make a mistake somewhere?

My solutions are from the handbook so I don't know whether they are correct or not.

THanks again for the solutions. :)

I was wondering if you could give me a simple explanation of how implicit differentiation works...Im very confused...

AppleXY

  • Life cannot be Delta Hedged.
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2619
  • Even when the bears bite, confidence never dies.
  • Respect: +16
Re: Differentiation...
« Reply #7 on: April 11, 2008, 07:55:59 pm »
0
Implicit differentiation is where you diff. all sides of the equation :) and subject dy/dx.

2009 - BBus (Econometrics/Economics&Fin) @ Monash


For Email: click here

Need a question answered? Merspi it!

[quote="Benjamin F

squance

  • Guest
Re: Differentiation...
« Reply #8 on: April 11, 2008, 07:58:32 pm »
0
Implicit differentiation is where you diff. all sides of the equation :) and subject dy/dx.

Do u think you could give me an example of how this works???

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Differentiation...
« Reply #9 on: April 11, 2008, 08:51:52 pm »
0
implicit differentiation is basically differentiating against y then add a dy/dx to the end:



with that, you can rearrange to find dy/dx.

such as:









Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

AppleXY

  • Life cannot be Delta Hedged.
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2619
  • Even when the bears bite, confidence never dies.
  • Respect: +16
Re: Differentiation...
« Reply #10 on: April 11, 2008, 09:46:45 pm »
0
Yeah, you can use the chain rule to find for example, i.e. to implicitly differentiate.

However, remember to use the most efficient way of differentiating.

(eg. don't implicitly diff x + y = 1 as y = 1 - x :. = -1)

« Last Edit: April 11, 2008, 10:36:00 pm by Ahmad »

2009 - BBus (Econometrics/Economics&Fin) @ Monash


For Email: click here

Need a question answered? Merspi it!

[quote="Benjamin F

squance

  • Guest
Re: Differentiation...
« Reply #11 on: April 12, 2008, 11:48:05 pm »
0
Thanks. I was able to do some of the simple implicit questions.

But then....I got stuck on these..can anyone figure this out for me....

loge(x/y) = cot(xy) (answer is y +y^x cosec^2 xy/x-x^2cosec^2 xy)

cos(x-y) = xe^x (for this one I got e^x(1+x)/(-sin(x-y)) but the answer says its 1 + e^x(1+x)/(sin(x-y))


Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Differentiation...
« Reply #12 on: April 13, 2008, 08:52:50 am »
0


using the chain rule on the left hand side:





using the quotient rule and implicitly differentiating y:





for the RHS:
the derivative of is

using the chain rule:





then using the product rule:




equating the LHS and RHS:




cross multiplying:











which is not algebraicly equivalent to the solution you gave...

did i make a mistake up there somewhere?

*and now i need to catch a train*
« Last Edit: April 13, 2008, 08:55:29 am by Mao »
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

dcc

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1198
  • Respect: +55
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Differentiation...
« Reply #13 on: April 13, 2008, 06:39:02 pm »
0


Consider:





Therefore, using the chain rule (for the left hand side) to implicitly differentiate (i.e )








dcc

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1198
  • Respect: +55
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Differentiation...
« Reply #14 on: April 13, 2008, 07:23:03 pm »
0
A tip for logarithms in general:

If a question asked you to do something like



Instead of having to use the quotient + chain rules, it is easier to just simply write:



and then differentiate each term separately (thus eliminating the annoyingness of the quotient rule)