Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

March 17, 2026, 02:39:31 pm

Author Topic: compak 2010 mistake ???  (Read 3032 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Albeno69

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 746
  • Respect: +2
compak 2010 mistake ???
« on: October 22, 2010, 12:21:34 pm »
0
i just completed compak 2010 and question 1.3.4 i think has an error?
how come they have debited prepaid rent revenue?

sam.utute

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1412
  • Connecturer.
  • Respect: +46
Re: compak 2010 mistake ???
« Reply #1 on: October 22, 2010, 12:44:00 pm »
0
I don't think it is an error. THe business received $850 per month as rent revenue in advance for May, June and July. This would have been recorded as prepaid rent revenue by the business (850x3=2550). At June 30, 2 months rent revenue has been earned, so an adjustment is necessary to record the revenue. Prepaid rent revenue was recorded as a liability (the business has an obligation to the renter (don't know the name lol)) and it needs to be debited to reduce the liability.

Adjustment:
DR. Prepaid Rent Revenue
         CR. Rent Revenue

Sam

Albeno69

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 746
  • Respect: +2
Re: compak 2010 mistake ???
« Reply #2 on: October 22, 2010, 12:49:00 pm »
0
our teacher told us that we always debit the revenue similar to unit 3 were it was credit the expense.lol

mmmmm

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 318
  • Respect: +1
Re: compak 2010 mistake ???
« Reply #3 on: October 30, 2010, 01:35:30 pm »
0
Are all the source documents wrong in the answers? And solution is missing Q1.1.4?

Also, how do you work out 300% mark up?  I never know how to do them.

mmmmm

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 318
  • Respect: +1
Re: compak 2010 mistake ???
« Reply #4 on: October 30, 2010, 01:40:47 pm »
0
Ps.  For Q2.1.2. Why didn't they put separate the amount for GST and sundries? :S

eeps

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2532
  • Respect: +343
Re: compak 2010 mistake ???
« Reply #5 on: October 30, 2010, 01:45:15 pm »
0
Also, how do you work out 300% mark up?  I never know how to do them.

Assuming you're talking about the Cost of Sales in the Stock Control account, you + 1 to the mark-up (i.e. if it's 300% mark-up = 3+1 = 4). So it is; $385,000 (Total Sales)/4 (3+1) which gives you $96,250 which is the right solution.
« Last Edit: October 30, 2010, 01:47:15 pm by EPL.11.4ever. »

mmmmm

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 318
  • Respect: +1
Re: compak 2010 mistake ???
« Reply #6 on: October 30, 2010, 02:02:11 pm »
0
Also, how do you work out 300% mark up?  I never know how to do them.

Assuming you're talking about the Cost of Sales in the Stock Control account, you + 1 to the mark-up (i.e. if it's 300% mark-up = 3+1 = 4). So it is; $385,000 (Total Sales)/4 (3+1) which gives you $96,250 which is the right solution.

Oh yup, i get it now. Thanks so much!! :)

mmmmm

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 318
  • Respect: +1
Re: compak 2010 mistake ???
« Reply #7 on: October 30, 2010, 02:05:08 pm »
0
Sorry, just another question.  In 2.1.2, where did they get the figure '41 503'?

_avO

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1915
  • Respect: +15
Re: compak 2010 mistake ???
« Reply #8 on: October 30, 2010, 02:13:37 pm »
0
Because of credit terms 2/14, they got a 2% discount
2011-2014: Bachelor of Commerce/Economics @ Monash Clayton

lilaznkev1n

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 327
  • illuminati
  • Respect: +19
  • School: Haileybury College
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: compak 2010 mistake ???
« Reply #9 on: October 30, 2010, 02:16:42 pm »
0
Sorry, just another question.  In 2.1.2, where did they get the figure '41 503'?

Due to the credit terms on the purchase of the new vehicle being 2/14 n/30, and the business paid within 12 days so the business will receive a discount of $847.
Therefore in the cash reciepts journal under bank it would be $41503 ($42350-$847), Discount revenue would be $847 and Sundries would be $42350.

Hope this helps :)
2010: Accounting [45], Legal Studies [42]
2011: Methods [38], English [41], Chem [37], Revolutions [44], Vietnamese [22]
ATAR: 97.45
2012-2014: B.Com @ Melb

lilaznkev1n

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 327
  • illuminati
  • Respect: +19
  • School: Haileybury College
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: compak 2010 mistake ???
« Reply #10 on: October 30, 2010, 02:17:35 pm »
0
Because of credit terms 2/14, they got a 2% discount
haha you replied while i was typing my answer :)
2010: Accounting [45], Legal Studies [42]
2011: Methods [38], English [41], Chem [37], Revolutions [44], Vietnamese [22]
ATAR: 97.45
2012-2014: B.Com @ Melb

mmmmm

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 318
  • Respect: +1
Re: compak 2010 mistake ???
« Reply #11 on: October 30, 2010, 02:26:18 pm »
0
Oh right! I'm an idiot. I didn't even look at the figure at the discount revenue column! So, i guess discount revenue applies to sundry creditor AND normal creditors.  But why didn't they separate the GST clearing....

Thanks :)

lilaznkev1n

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 327
  • illuminati
  • Respect: +19
  • School: Haileybury College
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: compak 2010 mistake ???
« Reply #12 on: October 30, 2010, 02:29:09 pm »
0
Oh right! I'm an idiot. I didn't even look at the figure at the discount revenue column! So, i guess discount revenue applies to sundry creditor AND normal creditors.  But why didn't they separate the GST clearing....

Thanks :)
GST wasn't seperated in the crj as in the previous question (2.1.1), GST was already recorded:

Feb1         Motor Vehicle                             38500DR
               GST Clearing                               3850DR
                    Sundry Creditor-Jones Motors                    42350CR
2010: Accounting [45], Legal Studies [42]
2011: Methods [38], English [41], Chem [37], Revolutions [44], Vietnamese [22]
ATAR: 97.45
2012-2014: B.Com @ Melb

_avO

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1915
  • Respect: +15
Re: compak 2010 mistake ???
« Reply #13 on: October 30, 2010, 02:38:54 pm »
0
GST isn't separated because the business is not obligated to pay GST to the ATO, but rather the Sundry Creditor (Jones Motors) is liable to pay that 3850 GST. Further, when a discount is offered it does not deduct any proportion of GST.
2011-2014: Bachelor of Commerce/Economics @ Monash Clayton

mmmmm

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 318
  • Respect: +1
Re: compak 2010 mistake ???
« Reply #14 on: October 30, 2010, 03:13:56 pm »
0
OH yup yup. So it's been incurred already (when it's been recorded in the general journal).  Recording it again in the CRJ would be recording it twice, right?