Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 16, 2025, 08:49:54 pm

Author Topic: Your Thoughts On Biology 2010 Exam 2  (Read 59036 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

shinny

  • VN MVP 2010
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4327
  • Respect: +256
  • School: Melbourne High School
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Your Thoughts On Biology 2010 Exam 2
« Reply #30 on: October 29, 2010, 05:44:48 pm »
0
redundancy with the genetic code = one mark i'm positive i dropped :(
just had no clue, related it to mutations hahah.

i talked about mutations too! so it wasn't that dumb a theory afterall!! :P

Well the point of redundancy is largely about mutations. Since there's multiple codons coding for the same amino acid, some mutations ('silent mutations') result in a change in a nucleotide, but not a change in the amino acid consequently produced. So basically, it's a protective mechanism against mutation.
MBBS (hons) - Monash University

YR11 '07: Biology 49
YR12 '08: Chemistry 47; Spesh 41; Methods 49; Business Management 50; English 43

ENTER: 99.70


stonecold

  • Victorian
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5335
  • Respect: +255
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Your Thoughts On Biology 2010 Exam 2
« Reply #31 on: October 29, 2010, 05:45:27 pm »
0
I'm, pretty sure that answer to q 1 Short answer was 2/3 yeah for the chance of being heterozygous?
i put 1/2 cause the chance of the offspring having the trait has the same chance each time and isnt affected by current offsprings? not too sure..i think vcaa does it in ur format :\

She couldn't be aa or two little alleles, otherwise she'd be shaded in, so you needed to discount it.
2011-13: BBiomed (Microbiology & Immunology Major) @ UniMelb


VCE 2009'10: English 46 | English Language 49 | Chemistry 50 | Biology 50 | Further Mathematics 48 | Mathematical Methods CAS 39
ATAR: 99.85

"Failure is not when one falls down but rather when one fails to get up" - unknown

sillysmile

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 644
  • :>
  • Respect: +11
Re: Your Thoughts On Biology 2010 Exam 2
« Reply #32 on: October 29, 2010, 05:45:32 pm »
0
Tooth question was a bit strange...

Fairly easy exam i reckon.....

The thing that stumped me was the guy with the abnormal chromosomes and that one question about the centromere i didnt understand really at all... what did people get for that?


same here, had to guess...
2010: Biology 37+   Literature 25+    Physical ed 36+   Psychology 44+
ATAR: 80+ and I will be happy.
2011: Psychological science @LaTrobe (bundoora campus)

"Wrinkles should merely indicate where smiles have been"-- Mark Twain

slothpomba

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4458
  • Chief Executive Sloth
  • Respect: +327
Re: Your Thoughts On Biology 2010 Exam 2
« Reply #33 on: October 29, 2010, 05:45:46 pm »
0
I wrote parabolic shape and choked... then i wrote tooth spacing.. probably wrong

I think Y was the gorilla? Maybe im getting the order mixed up in my head

ATAR Notes Chat
Philosophy thread
-----
2011-15: Bachelor of Science/Arts (Religious studies) @ Monash Clayton - Majors: Pharmacology, Physiology, Developmental Biology
2016: Bachelor of Science (Honours) - Psychiatry research

slothpomba

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4458
  • Chief Executive Sloth
  • Respect: +327
Re: Your Thoughts On Biology 2010 Exam 2
« Reply #34 on: October 29, 2010, 05:46:39 pm »
0
Tooth question was a bit strange...

Fairly easy exam i reckon.....

The thing that stumped me was the guy with the abnormal chromosomes and that one question about the centromere i didnt understand really at all... what did people get for that?


same here, had to guess...


i guessed 25%

From what people are saying here... i might of actually got the mark haha

ATAR Notes Chat
Philosophy thread
-----
2011-15: Bachelor of Science/Arts (Religious studies) @ Monash Clayton - Majors: Pharmacology, Physiology, Developmental Biology
2016: Bachelor of Science (Honours) - Psychiatry research

stonecold

  • Victorian
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5335
  • Respect: +255
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Your Thoughts On Biology 2010 Exam 2
« Reply #35 on: October 29, 2010, 05:47:24 pm »
0
'and the jaw one, I said X was gorilla because it had molars.. and I was like, do gorillas eat meat too? :< but yeah molars and parabolic shape of teeth' confirm/deny my trusty Biology winners.

I said X was australopithicus...

It had a more parabolic jaw, and the front teeth were smaller.
2011-13: BBiomed (Microbiology & Immunology Major) @ UniMelb


VCE 2009'10: English 46 | English Language 49 | Chemistry 50 | Biology 50 | Further Mathematics 48 | Mathematical Methods CAS 39
ATAR: 99.85

"Failure is not when one falls down but rather when one fails to get up" - unknown

itsMRPHI

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 22
  • Respect: 0
Re: Your Thoughts On Biology 2010 Exam 2
« Reply #36 on: October 29, 2010, 05:48:50 pm »
0
what the hell was the answer to the centromere being inactive in chromosome 2?

masonnnn

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 283
  • I'm an art student at heart, can't you tell?
  • Respect: +1
Re: Your Thoughts On Biology 2010 Exam 2
« Reply #37 on: October 29, 2010, 05:49:20 pm »
0
the larger toothed one, X was the gorilla i believe. Larger molars as they're herbivores and large molars are good for eating fibrous plants thus also a larger jaw.

also wasn't positive about the centromere one, i think i talked about how if it had the centromere activated normal genes would've still been expressed by the homologous chromosome or sister chromatid or some crap. can't remember already hahah.
2010: Chem, Lit, Bio, Psych and Further.
201_: Postgraduate Medicine...

stonecold

  • Victorian
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5335
  • Respect: +255
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Your Thoughts On Biology 2010 Exam 2
« Reply #38 on: October 29, 2010, 05:49:54 pm »
0
what the hell was the answer to the centromere being inactive in chromosome 2?

I put that it could no longer attach to spindle fibres in mitosis and meiosis, so the chromosome number reduced, leading to the evolution of humans.
2011-13: BBiomed (Microbiology & Immunology Major) @ UniMelb


VCE 2009'10: English 46 | English Language 49 | Chemistry 50 | Biology 50 | Further Mathematics 48 | Mathematical Methods CAS 39
ATAR: 99.85

"Failure is not when one falls down but rather when one fails to get up" - unknown

slothpomba

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4458
  • Chief Executive Sloth
  • Respect: +327
Re: Your Thoughts On Biology 2010 Exam 2
« Reply #39 on: October 29, 2010, 05:51:33 pm »
0

I said X was australopithicus...

It had a more parabolic jaw, and the front teeth were smaller.
Also wrote X

Bullshitted my way through the centromere one....
Probably 0 marks i reckon

ATAR Notes Chat
Philosophy thread
-----
2011-15: Bachelor of Science/Arts (Religious studies) @ Monash Clayton - Majors: Pharmacology, Physiology, Developmental Biology
2016: Bachelor of Science (Honours) - Psychiatry research

Hope

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 140
  • Respect: +1
Re: Your Thoughts On Biology 2010 Exam 2
« Reply #40 on: October 29, 2010, 05:53:11 pm »
0

I said X was australopithicus...

It had a more parabolic jaw, and the front teeth were smaller.
Also wrote X

Bullshitted my way through the centromere one....
Probably 0 marks i reckon
Wrote X too

and I bullshitted too. Probably 0 marks

Raiinman

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 41
  • Respect: 0
Re: Your Thoughts On Biology 2010 Exam 2
« Reply #41 on: October 29, 2010, 05:55:02 pm »
0

I said X was australopithicus...

It had a more parabolic jaw, and the front teeth were smaller.
Also wrote X

Bullshitted my way through the centromere one....
Probably 0 marks i reckon
+1
2009: Methods: 40
2010: Biology: 40 English: 39 Specialists: 37 Chemistry: 45 Physics: 36

fujiismydog

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 11
  • Respect: +1
Re: Your Thoughts On Biology 2010 Exam 2
« Reply #42 on: October 29, 2010, 05:55:40 pm »
0
I said when the chromosomes fused, it allowed more genes to be held on a single chromosome, therefore the more complex an organism becomes the need for more genes for gene expression. Pretty much took a guess though.

The ratio I got was 2/3??
« Last Edit: October 29, 2010, 05:57:24 pm by fujiismydog »

Wally

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 93
  • Respect: +1
Re: Your Thoughts On Biology 2010 Exam 2
« Reply #43 on: October 29, 2010, 05:57:50 pm »
0
Hey said when the chromosomes fused, it allowed more genes to be held on a single chromosome, therefore the more complex an organism becomes the need for more genes for gene expression.

i said this too and that the lack of the centromere allowed more genes to become permanent and there's less chance of these genes being mutated or whatever. pretty much made it up!!
2009: HHD [33]

2010: English [33] . Biology [31] . Methods CAS [24] . Physical Education [38] . Food Technology [39]  13 years of full time school is now done and dusted!

Atar needed: 76.15
My 2010 ATAR 76.25


2011: Deakin Uni - fingers crossed!!

jasoN-

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 661
  • Respect: +7
  • School: WSC
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Your Thoughts On Biology 2010 Exam 2
« Reply #44 on: October 29, 2010, 05:59:05 pm »
0
i made it up too
i wrote that if the centromere is inactive, chromosome A and B (the ancestral ones) cannot be inherited, and hence is removed from the gene pool (eventually). Thus the human chromosome is the only one that can be inherited
make bull shit up ftw
2009-10: Methods (39) - Specialist Maths (36) - Further Maths (50) - Biology (36) - Chemistry (37) - English Language (36) - ATAR: 97.40
2011-2014: B.Pharm @ Monash University
2015+: Life