Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 02:53:16 pm

Author Topic: some interesting extraneous variables  (Read 989 times)  Share 

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

sillysmile

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 644
  • :>
  • Respect: +11
some interesting extraneous variables
« on: October 31, 2010, 11:24:01 pm »
0
a well-known problem in polling and surveys relates to the wording of the question. Results may vary considerably depending on how a question is worded. The New York Times/CBS News polltakers did an experiment in which they asked people the following question:
Do you think there should be an amendment to the Constitution prohibiting abortions, or shouldn't there be such an amendment?
Only 29% replied yes to that question. 62% said no, and the rest were undecided. Later, the same people were asked the following question:
Do you believe there should be an amendment to the Constitution protecting the life of the unborn child, or shouldn't there be such an amendment?
This time, 50% of the respondents said yes and 39% said no (Dionne, 1980). Clearly the wording of the question influenced the outcome.


another issue can arise when subjects resent being included in research and try to sabotage it. This is a problem at some colleges and universities where introductory students must participate in a subject pool, serving as volunteers, whether or not they they want to. Some students produce deliberately absurd data, such as marking all their answers the same way. When I was in graduate school this was called the "F--- You" effect.
« Last Edit: October 31, 2010, 11:30:10 pm by sillysmile »
2010: Biology 37+   Literature 25+    Physical ed 36+   Psychology 44+
ATAR: 80+ and I will be happy.
2011: Psychological science @LaTrobe (bundoora campus)

"Wrinkles should merely indicate where smiles have been"-- Mark Twain

Glockmeister

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1660
  • RIP Sweet Nothings.
  • Respect: +8
"this post is more confusing than actual chemistry.... =S" - Mao

[22:07] <robbo> i luv u Glockmeister

<Glockmeister> like the people who like do well academically
<Glockmeister> tend to deny they actually do well
<%Neobeo> sounds like Ahmad0
<@Ahmad0> no
<@Ahmad0> sounds like Neobeo

2007: Mathematical Methods 37; Psychology 38
2008: English 33; Specialist Maths 32 ; Chemistry 38; IT: Applications 42
2009: Bachelor of Behavioural Neuroscience, Monash University.