I would probably go with 1 - PC, euphemisms to avoid taboos 2 - dysphemisms and politically INcorrect language when a user doesnt want to avoid taboo topics. Both sides of the story basically. Then 3 - maybe something on politeness and social distance, more acceptable when there is closer social proximity.
Relating all these to the POA as I went along.
Yeah, both sides always shows depth in understanding IMO...
Also important to remember that taboos are culturally defined. What is taboo in one culture may be considered perfectly acceptable in another.
And with PC, I don't even argue for it the whole time. It is plain dumb to say that PC has reduced discrimination. There are so many examples of people using discriminatory language or maintaining discriminatory attitudes. The idea that eradicating discriminatory language would also suppress discriminatory attitudes shows a lack of understanding towards how language really works...
I massively hate PC, think it is the biggest wank. I hope it comes up tomorrow so I can tear it to shreds...
It has done jack for society, but seeing as VCE is all about conformity, I have to do it in a way which is descriptive which effectively prevents me from arguing totally against it, cause then the examiner will tear me to shreds...