Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

August 25, 2025, 11:38:27 pm

Author Topic: Light question 2  (Read 3026 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Whatlol

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 928
  • Respect: +2
Light question 2
« on: November 10, 2010, 04:26:56 pm »
0
Hmm has anyone noticed itute said observation 3 for this.. i would have thought observation 2.
failed uni

jackchan1993

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 63
  • Respect: +1
Re: Light question 2
« Reply #1 on: November 10, 2010, 04:28:43 pm »
0
it said select and observation lol, as in elaborate on any one of the observations

Elnino_Gerrard

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 353
  • Respect: +6
Re: Light question 2
« Reply #2 on: November 10, 2010, 04:28:48 pm »
0
wtf? 3? i said 2// :o
2010 VCE ATAR : 98.35

Elnino_Gerrard

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 353
  • Respect: +6
Re: Light question 2
« Reply #3 on: November 10, 2010, 04:29:17 pm »
0
No i clearly remmeber it said wave model could account for 2 of the observations but not one of them
2010 VCE ATAR : 98.35

Whatlol

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 928
  • Respect: +2
Re: Light question 2
« Reply #4 on: November 10, 2010, 04:29:52 pm »
0
Yea the question says "select the observation that the wave model cannot explain"
and it said the wave model can explain two of these obsevations but not a third
failed uni

99.95Bitches

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 11
  • Respect: 0
Re: Light question 2
« Reply #5 on: November 10, 2010, 04:34:17 pm »
0
Hmm has anyone noticed itute said observation 3 for this.. i would have thought observation 2.


itute dont even have answers up yet though
2009- Methods (CAS) [41]
2010- Spec, Physics, Chem, Eng lang, Bus Man

Whatlol

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 928
  • Respect: +2
Re: Light question 2
« Reply #6 on: November 10, 2010, 04:34:39 pm »
0
Hmm has anyone noticed itute said observation 3 for this.. i would have thought observation 2.


itute dont even have answers up yet though
http://www.itute.com/board/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=1923&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=30
failed uni

Blakhitman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1954
  • Respect: +7
Re: Light question 2
« Reply #7 on: November 10, 2010, 04:40:59 pm »
0
First he had 1 then changed to 3.

When I'm pretty sure it is 2.

Whatlol

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 928
  • Respect: +2
Re: Light question 2
« Reply #8 on: November 10, 2010, 04:41:43 pm »
0
First he had 1 then changed to 3.

When I'm pretty sure it is 2.

same, if it turns out to be 3 im sure alot of people are going to fail that question
failed uni

minimum

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 22
  • Respect: 0
Re: Light question 2
« Reply #9 on: November 10, 2010, 06:41:52 pm »
0
it said select and observation lol, as in elaborate on any one of the observations


It specifically asked "which of these observations the wave model cannot explain?"
and I'm pretty sure the answer is observation 2.
This was a similar question to one the insight exams.

Whatlol

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 928
  • Respect: +2
Re: Light question 2
« Reply #10 on: November 10, 2010, 06:55:15 pm »
0
it said select and observation lol, as in elaborate on any one of the observations


It specifically asked "which of these observations the wave model cannot explain?"
and I'm pretty sure the answer is observation 2.
This was a similar question to one the insight exams.


yea its ok, itute has changed it now
failed uni

cod101

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 24
  • Respect: 0
Re: Light question 2
« Reply #11 on: November 10, 2010, 07:03:14 pm »
0
i got 2 :-X